<u>Answer:</u>
<em>Yes, but only to clarify the ambiguous contract terms
</em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Breach of contract is a legitimate reason for activity and a sort of common wrong, wherein a sound understanding of anticipated trade isn't regarded by at least one of the gatherings to the agreement by non-execution or obstruction with the other party's presentation.
A material breach is the most genuine type of break of agreement. In these cases, somebody has failed to maintain their obligations as spread out in the contract. At the point when this happens, the harmed party can seek after harms in a standard suit. In the end, when a contractual worker finishes an undertaking yet isn't paid, this is viewed as a material breach.
Answer:
a) Removal of unwanted buildings
d) Brokerage commission
e) Survey fees and legal fees
f) Purchase price
Answer: Ralph does not have a good claim against Snowdrop, because age was not the deciding factor in Snowdrop’s decision to lay off Ralph.
Explanation: The reason for the firm laying off Ralph is vague and not explicitly stated. Therefore Ralph cannot make a claim against Snowdrop for laying him off due to his age.
Product positioning is the process of deciding and communicating how you want your market to think and feel about your product
