1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
shepuryov [24]
3 years ago
8

Why did creditors foreclose on so many farms during the depression?

History
2 answers:
yuradex [85]3 years ago
7 0

Many farmers borrowed money from banks using the equity in their property and equipment. Many of these loans were designed to cash in on the expansion of demand in the market. The Great Depression caused the markets to collapse and the banks foreclosed on the property for unpaid debt.

Georgia [21]3 years ago
4 0
Many farmers borrowed money from the bank to buy equipment so when the depression started they could not pay back the money causing the banks to take the land.
You might be interested in
For an experiment, a scientist designs a can, 20 cm in height, that can hold water. A tube is installed at the bottom of the can
boyakko [2]
And I- oooppp.. purrrr
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
You usually do not need to take a large risk for a large potential reward ture or false
nekit [7.7K]
True I hope I helped you good luck!!!!
8 0
3 years ago
On what grounds did the Austrian-born economist Friedrich A. Hayek reject the New Deal state?
GenaCL600 [577]

The correct answer is letter C.

Explanation:  Liberal economist Friedrich Hayek, identified in early 1929 that the economic boom would end. And it was right. The result of this state intervention in the economy was the crash of the New York Stock Exchange in October 1929, which, until today, is mentioned by the enemies of liberty as the fault of "capitalism."

5 0
3 years ago
while this country never formally joined to Axis Powers or joined World War ll, it did form an alliance with Germany and did in
Otrada [13]

Axis would have probably wiped out most of its West-European enemies. Canada would probably have tried to fight against America and failed, getting its armies crushed, or stayed on the defensive. Hitler would probably have had more troops and peace of  mind tromping around around the Soviet grounds, and would have lost a lot less manpower than when the US actually went to war in the real WWII. Since I'm assuming that in this hypothetical scenario, the US was allied with Japan, Pearl Harbor never happened. Japan and America would both have undisputed hold of the Pacific, with America's (unsunken) battleships and aircraft carriers along with Japanese suprbattleships like the Yamato, and dual force garrisons on the pacific islands. America might have invaded the lower Americas as well, if it didn't stop at securing the border. Mexico might have joined in to help the Axis powers. Then Hitler would still turn on Stalin, still loose an ungodly portion of his army in Russia, get driven back, and start losing the war in the European theatre, at least until axis forces come to back him up, primarily in the form of American Axis soldiers. Then America would lose many men in the Russian front, until it finally invaded Russia somehow (probably after many years and the combined nuclear armaments research being conducted by the US and Nazi Germany.) After invading Russia, Hitler will grow pompous and attempt to invade America with his already weakened force. He would attempt to destroy the remaining American troops in the European/Asian Theatre. America and Japan would probably ally with each other to maintain their hold of the Pacific, and fight back, with a smaller scale D-Day happening (Only made up of Americans) being launched from the invaded and annexed New American Britain or New German Britain or whatever. America would invade Germany, while Germany cannot invade America (see other Quora posts for explanations on why it is virtually impossible to invade America). America ends up with territories and troops spread all across the Pacific, Africa, Russia, Europe, and Asia, with probably troops in Canada and Mexico as well. Consequently, the troops will be brought down through the freedom fighters and rebellions that will ultimately pop up. Hitler shoots himself in the bunker as well.

Lots of bloodshed. Thank god it didn't happen this way! A lot of countries would be utterly in ruins after this version of the World War, not just Poland and Germany and England and Russia and Korea and China (etc.), but who knows how many more countless places. Not to say that I am okay with WWII happening how it did anyway, since it was extremely bloody as well, but... the real WWII was a giant bloody clash of death. This hypothetical one wouldn't have been a clash. It would have been a giant cluster that resulted in possibly twice or three times as many deaths, mostly more civilian deaths in general.

5 0
3 years ago
Which term best describes the turkish government action against the armenians?
solong [7]

The best description of the Turkish government to the American is Genocide. The term Genocide is intentional action to destroy a people (usually defined as an ethnic, national, racial, or religious group) in whole or in part. This shift toward Turkish nationalism left the Armenian political leadership in an impossible position.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Auppose ou have the job of assigning the proper number of house of representatives seats of various states to do that you must k
    8·1 answer
  • Where did different groups settle in the Americas (before contact) and how and why did they move to and within the Americas (aft
    11·1 answer
  • Identify the data point that shows a major effect of the Black Death.
    9·1 answer
  • In what ways did the colonies of Maryland and Pennsylvania serve as models of religious toleration during the colonial period? H
    7·2 answers
  • This editorial cartoon from 1812 depicts the situation of gerrymandering," which is
    6·1 answer
  • The Swahili coast was a marketplace for traders from which locations? Check all that apply. 1. Arabia 2. Asia 3. Australia 4. No
    7·1 answer
  • I can't figure this one out i could use some help
    9·1 answer
  • 3. Why are Akhenaton and Tutankhamen<br> considered unusual pharaohs?
    12·1 answer
  • Who got the Nobel Prize in literature in 1993? What nationality was this person
    5·2 answers
  • Which statement describes William Blackstone's contribution to government
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!