The gradual modification of anatomical structures during the period from conception to maturity is development.
An anatomical structure is any biological entity that occupies space and is outstanding from its environment. Anatomical structures may be macroscopic inclusive of a carpel or microscopic which includes an acrosome.
Anatomy is the observation of body structures and physiology is the observation of their characteristic. The human frame is organized into exclusive tiers. First, atoms make up molecules that shape cells, and membrane sure compartments that contain molecular machinery important for life-sustaining reactions.
Anatomy, a subject within the biological sciences worried with the identification and description of the frame systems of residing matters. Gross anatomy entails the look at principal body structures with the aid of dissection and commentary and in its narrowest sense is worried best with the human body
Learn more about Anatomy here:brainly.com/question/14135182
#SPJ4
The answer A.true it is easier because you can make your own judgement than just right on agree to something
The problem boils down to money, but I am assuming you are looking for the causes of the problem.
<span>1. Social Security was never indexed correctly to accommodate the growing life expectancy on those drawing on it. The age at which you can collect should have changed in concert with the life expectancy of the population, or the amount of the benefits should have been decreased if they wanted to keep the age at which you receive it from keeping pace with lefe expectancy. </span>
<span>2. The growth in income inequality has led to vast amounts of money being earned by fewer people and the tax on social security has a limit so any income over the limit is not subject to the tax. Right now that cap is around 109k/year...so someone making 125k/year pays the same amount into social security as someone making 10 million a year. As more wealth is concentrated with fewer people, even vast increases in income and/or wealth yields little increase to the amount collected via the SS tax. </span>
<span>3. Not necessarily on the scale as 1 and 2 above but fraud is also a cause of the monetary shortfall. There are those that cheat the system. Every so often you will hear stories of people getting caught in social security fraud rings where they collect either through identity theft or other criminal means. You also have people that will collect when a relative passes away. They will purposely not report the death or provide invalid SS information so they will continue to receive the deceased person's benefits long after they have died. </span>
<span>As far as a solution, you are stuck with the eventuality of either decreasing benefits, raising the retirement age, or increasing the amount of taxes collected...none of which are likely to fly in Congress. Programs like SS rely on growing the base of people from which you are collecting, but at some point this does not happen. Population growth is not automatic and even with population growth, the concentration of income at the top percent of people offsets any such growth. It may be considered a very progressive/liberal thought, but eliminating the cap on income from which SS tax is collected would help. You can still keep the cap on SS benefits meaning the people at the top of the income ladder would be paying far more than they would get out of it in 10 lifetimes...but this would neutralize the income inequality impact on the system. To be honest, if there was an easy solution, we would have done it by now.</span>
One early and one subsequent motive that drove
Columbus to oppress indigenous peoples, according to Zinn it was out of fear of the other. <span>Columbus
initially feared those who were there, believing that they stood in the way of
his conquest and eventual glory. The other thing is that subsequent coveting of
wealth helped Columbus to oppress indigenous peoples.</span>
Desertification has led to limited necessary goods like water and crop reduction. This resulted in the Arab Spring, an uprising in North Africa, particularly Tunisia, where the price of bread became too unaffordable.