Answer:
violates common law
Explanation:
A non compete is an agreement that restricts a previous employee from working for a competitor of his former company for a given period after disengagement.
This is a contract that aims to reduce to the rate at which company secrets are shared to competitors.
The rationale is that the employee's knowledge of the company's procedures will be obsolete after some years.
However non compete should not last for a very long time. Usually non compete of more than two to three years is not honoured by courts.
So in the given scenario where Harold the head chef at the Italian Olive Restaurant signed a non compete which restricts him from opening a restaurant for the next 15 years. The court will most likely not honour the non compete because the amount of time is not reasonable.
The first marketing law suggests that in order to be successful in the market, the marketers need to understand the customer's demand and identify the brand positioning of the product in the market. Therefore, the option C holds true.
<h3>What is the significance of marketing laws?</h3>
Marketing laws are the ones that are universally accepted principles followed by marketers in order to get successful position in the market. The first and foremost law tells about how one should position the brand in a market over the demand of customers.
Therefore, the option C holds true and states regarding the significance of marketing laws.
Learn more about marketing laws here:
brainly.com/question/16264752
#SPJ4
The incomplete question has been completed below for better reference.
A. Understand customer's demands
B. Identify brand positioning
C. Both A and B
D. None of these
Answer:
I RLLY NEED THESE POINTS IM SO SORRY!
Explanation:
The first and last one, the ones with the budget, and the one with the functional goals
Answer:
not acceptable because stealing is never justifiable.
Explanation:
Margo has been taking money without Cora's knowledge and giving to the homeless, this is stealing and even though Margo is trying to justify it by giving to the homeless it still does not change the fact that she is wrong.
Judeo-Christian values promotes charity among the poor but also strictly prohibits theft. So Marco should have told Cora what he intended to do.
