The sections of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms being challenged are:
- Jake Devereux - Section 12 - Treatment or punishment.
- Tanya Gillis - Section 10 - Arrest or detention.
- Alex Cortes - Section 2 - Fundamental freedoms.
- Stephanie Klassen - Section 14 - Interpreter
- David Korman - Section 11 - Proceedings in criminal and penal matters
- Baltej Singh Dhillon - Section 2 - Fundamental freedoms.
- Jim Keegstra - Section 2 - Fundamental freedoms.
<h3>Which rights are violated?</h3>
Jake Devereux's right to avoid cruel and unusual punishment is violated. Tanya's right is also violated as she should be told why she is arrested.
Alex Cortes has the right to freedom of association and this was violated by Thames Center Council.
Stephanie Klassen has the right to an interpreter if she doesn't understand a language so this is another violation. David Korman has the right to an unbiased trial so the choice of the judge shouldn't matter.
Baltej Singh Dhillon has the right to freedom of religious practice so he shouldn't be fired for wearing what his religion tells him too.
Jim Keegstra's right is not violated because laws and actions against Hate speech can supersede Section 2's fundamental rights.
Question is:
What section of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is relevant and is that section being violated?
Find out more on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms at brainly.com/question/20329431.
#SPJ1
