Answer and Explanation:
A. Because plagiarism is a crime and contradicts an attorney's moral and ethical code. This takes away all the credibility of the lawyer, shows that he is not able to hold the position, in addition to showing that he acts in criminal activities of high gravity and therefore must be punished immediately and have his profession questioned.
B. The Iowa court referred to other cases involving plagiarism, which is the practice that allows someone else's works and words to be copied without due credit. Cases of plagiarism are very common and the Iowa court must treat everyone with the same severity in order for them to be fought.
5th Amendment Right of Persons,
FIFTH AMENDMENT
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "National supremacy".
Explanation:
- A term used only to characterize the United States Constitution's power over laws put in place by nations that might be at variance with either the ideals maintained by the fathers of the republic once they established the transitional government, is National supremacy.
- Article VI of that same Constitution provides for American sovereignty, which ensures that state statutes could not prevail over or refute Congressional legislation or US Supreme court decisions.
Therefore, National supremacy is the right answer.
Answer:
When you can't speak out for your race and who you want to be and how we live our life. Hope this helps.
Explanation:
