All categories

2 years ago

0 divided by 0 is? 45 points for who answer its correct not for a homework

Mathematics

2 answers:

Elenna [48]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Undefined

Step-by-step explanation:

No multiplicative inverse exists for 0

I am Lyosha [343]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

undefined

Step-by-step explanation:

a single value can't be assigned to a fraction where the denominator is 0 so the value remains undefined.

You might be interested in

Find the Area of the Polygons:

elena-s [515]

Answer:

480

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Multiply 6√3 • 8√14 • √10 • √2

uranmaximum [27]

Answer:

96 sqrt(210)

Step-by-step explanation:

6√3 • 8√14 • √10 • √2

We multiply what is outside the square roots with what is outside the square roots and what is inside the square roots with what is inside the square roots

6*8 = 48

3*14*10*2 = 840

6√3 • 8√14 • √10 • √2

48 sqrt(840)

48 sqrt( 4*210)

sqrt(a*b) = sqrt(a) sqrt(b)

48 sqrt(4) sqrt(210)

48 *2 sqrt(210)

96 sqrt(210)

210 is 3*7 *5*2 which are all primes, so we cannot simplify the sqrt (210)

7 0

3 years ago

A data mining routine has been applied to a transaction dataset and has classified 88 records as fraudulent (30 correctly so) an

chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer:

The classification matrix is attached below

Part a

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is 65.91%.

Part b

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is 96.64%

Step-by-step explanation:

The classification matrix is obtained as shown below:

The transaction dataset has 30 fraudulent correctly classified records out of 88 records, that is, 30 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is negative.

Also, there would be 88 - 30 = 58 non-fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 58 records are incorrectly predicted given that an instance is positive.

The transaction dataset has 920 non-fraudulent correctly classified records out of 952 records, that is, 920 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is positive.

Also, there would be 952 - 920 = 32 fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 32 records incorrectly predicted given that an instance is negative.

That is,

Predicted value

Active value Fraudulent Non-fraudulent

Fraudlent 30 58

non-fraudulent 32 920

The classification matrix is obtained by using the information related to the transaction data, which is classified into fraudulent records and non-fraudulent records.

The error rate is obtained as shown below:

The error rate is obtained by taking the ratio of $\left( {b + c} \right)(b+c)$ and the total number of records.

The classification matrix is, shown above

The total number of records is, $30 + 58 + 32 + 920 = 1,040$

The error rate is,

$\begin{array}{c}\\{\rm{Error}}\,{\rm{rate}} = \frac{{b + c}}{{{\rm{Total}}}}\\\\ = \frac{{58 + 32}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = \frac{{90}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = 0.0865\\\end{array}$

The percentage is $0.0865 \times 100 = 8.65$

(a)

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained by taking the rate ratio of b and $\left( {a + b} \right)(a+b)$ .

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown above and in the attachment

The error rate for truly fraudulent is,

$\begin{array}{c}\\FP = \frac{b}{{a + b}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{30 + 58}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{88}}\\\\ = 0.6591\\\end{array}$

The percentage is, $0.6591 \times 100 = 65.91$

(b)

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained by taking the ratio of d and $\left( {c + d} \right)(c+d)$ .

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown in the attachment

The error rate for truly non-fraudulent is,

$\begin{array}{c}\\TP = \frac{d}{{c + d}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{32 + 920}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{952}}\\\\ = 0.9664\\\end{array}$

The percentage is, $0.9664 \times 100 = 96.64$

8 0

3 years ago

X/7 > -2. Solve and graph. Help.

ikadub [295]

This is the answer hope i helped

8 0

3 years ago

How do I figure this out?

miskamm [114]

Answer:

You can figure this out by seeing this max and min lengths, which is 1 and -1, and the distance of which the graph goes upward and downward, which is 2pi. So, the answer has to be sin2x

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers