We are forced to make choices in our day to day life because our resources are limited.
An example of this limited resources is our financial resources, we need to work to earn money to buy our necessities to live a comfortable life. Simply put, no work no pay. No pay, no food. No food, no life. So, no choice but work.
$4 million.
An item is worth what the market is willing to pay for it, which is sometimes different than the estimated value.
Based on the economic and financial analysis, the main reason for considering <u>nonconstant growth</u> in dividends is to allow for "<u>Supernormal</u>" growth rates over "<u>some finite length of time</u>."
This is because, in nonconstant growth, the growth rate cannot surpass the mandatory return indefinitely.
However, there is the probability that it could do so for some number of years.
Also, it should be noted that in this situation, the value of the stock equates to the present value of all the future dividends.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is <u>supernormal</u> and <u>some finite length of time</u>.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/13223703
Answer:
less volatile the price of a security, the wider the bid-asked spread.
Explanation:
From the answers listed in the question the one that would be considered false would be that the less volatile the price of a security, the wider the bid-asked spread. This is because the bid-asked spread usually depends on the liquidity of the asset, when the asset has a large enough liquidity which causes the volatility to be low the bid-asked spread becomes very narrow since there is not much demand for buyers willing to pay higher prices for the asset in question. The opposite occurs if an asset is very popular and volatility is high which creates a much wider bid-asked spread.
Answer:
B. negative, positive
Explanation:
Substitution effect : Price rise of a good makes it relatively expensive, decreases its demand. Price fall of a good makes it relatively cheap, increases its demand.
So: Substitution Effect is always negative as per above explanation.
Income Effect : Price rise of a good decreases real income/ real purchasing power of consumer & reduces demand of all goods. Price fall increases real purchasing power & increases demand of all goods.
Income effect is positive in case of Normal Goods, normal good demand is positively related to income. The effect is negative in case of inferior goods, inferior good demand is negatively related to income.
Hence: Price rise of rice - Substitution effect results in negative change in rice consumption. {∵substitution effect always negative}
Income Effect leads to positive change in rice consumption {∵price rise reduces real income & income effect is negative for inferior goods}
