Options :
a. mistake.
b. opinion.
c. an adhesion contract.
d. fraud.
Answer: Fraud
Explanation: From the scenario described above, it could be inferred that Ken, the real estate agent used trickery to lure Lily into purchasing the property. Hence, Lily could be said to have been defrauded by Ken who used what Lily needed to trick her into making the purchase because the main specification, that is high traffic, which Ken used to lure Lily was actually false. Fraud remains a grave offence as it could only be carried out by lying, issuing false statement, blackmail, impersonation and other grave offences.
Answer:
$176,800
Explanation:
Operating income ×income tax rate
$520,000 × 34% = $176,800
Therefore Provincial would report $176,800 of income tax expense as a separately stated line item in the income statement because $520,000 is the operating income tax before-tax income statement items and 34% is the actual income rate.
Answer:
C.good
Explanation:
A business can offer either goods or services. Goods are tangible products that can be touched, seen, smelled, eaten, etc., depending on the product, e.g. Coke, chocolate, cars, etc. Services are intangible, meaning that they cannot be seen or touched, they are experienced, e.g. going ot the movies, staying at a hotel, etc.
The arbitrage profit implied by these prices is $5.24.
<h3>Arbitrage profit</h3>
Given:
Future contract= 1645
Sport gold price = 1592
Risk-free rate (rf) = .03
Hence:
Arbitrage profit=1645-[1592(1+1.03)¹]
Arbitrage profit=1645- 1639.76
Arbitrage profit=1645 =$5.24
Therefore the arbitrage profit implied by these prices is $5.24.
Learn more about arbitrage profit here:brainly.com/question/15394730
#SPJ1
If a firm in a purely competitive market can differentiate its product or service, it becomes part of a monopolistic competition market.
Monopolistic competition is a type of imperfect competition in which many manufacturers compete with each other, but sell different products, so they are not perfect substitutes.
These sellers can calculate their prices based on the uniqueness of the products they are offering, so you cannot compete on price. Also, this company that
has full control or is trying to have full control of something, especially has areas of business that no one else is involved with. She didn't think the fines would be a sufficient deterrent to monopoly practices by large manufacturers. The company has been accused of monopolistic conduct.
Learn more about monopolistic here
brainly.com/question/25717627
#SPJ4
