The answers are
1.rising water temperatures.
2. land-based pollutants.
3. overfishing.
Hope I helped,
Ms. Weasley<span>
</span>
Answer:
She most likely was trying to see how much the plant has grown over a certain amount of time each measurement was taken. (See more below.)
Explanation:
Once she measured how much the plant has grown, she compared it. She could have compared it by subtracting the newest height to the height taken before present measurement. A good experimental conclusion differs from an inference is by data. A good experimental conclusion has data that has been measured from testable concepts and has detailed data; therefore, reliable. If you were to inference the experiment, it would not be reliable data since it is a guess based on the experiments appearance. For example, if she were to make an inference on this experiment, she could have observed the plant when it was a sapling. When she had seen the sapling has grown overtime, she could say that it grew roughly 5 inches in height, and that would not be reliable since no further measurements was taken before or after the plant is/was growing.
<span>The 1960 Chile earthquake was a magnitude 9.5 the largest earthquake ever recorded!</span>
Carbon cycle is process that shows the exchnge of carbon in the living and atmospheric system. Carbon cycle starts with the giving off of carbon dioxide from nimals, accumulation of co2 of plants, contribution of organic matter of dead animals and plants, photosynthesis, etc. The answer is D. fermentation
