Question

In Segura v. United States (1984), although evidence discovered during an illegal entry into an apartment was excluded, evidence later found in the apartment with a warrant obtained with information totally unconnected with the illegal entry was admissible under the:

Answer 1

In Segura v. the United States (1984), although evidence discovered during an illegal entry into an apartment was excluded, evidence later found in the apartment with a warrant obtained with information totally unconnected with the illegal entry was admissible under the harmless error doctrine.

What is a Harmless Error?

• In terms of American law, a harmless error doctrine is when a trial judge makes a decision that, while incorrect, does not satisfy the requirements for a losing party to successfully challenge the trier of fact's first judgment on appeal or to demand a new trial.
• It is simplest to comprehend harmless error doctrine in an evidentiary setting. According to Federal Rule of Evidence 103, evidentiary errors are subject to harmless error analysis.
• The general requirement when contending that evidence was wrongfully admitted or excluded is to demonstrate that the trial judge's correct decision could have, on the balance of probability, led to the opposite finding of fact.

To learn more about Harmless Error refer to:

brainly.com/question/14287771

#SPJ4