To multiply or divide rational expressions, what is expected is that the 2 numerators and the 2 denominators are multiplied or divided with each other.
<h3>What is a rational expression?
</h3>
This is the ratio of two polynomials in mathematics. To multiply the expression it is the same as the normal multiplication done in mathematics.
The numerators first have to be multiplied together and then the same is done to the denominator.
Read more on rational expressions here: brainly.com/question/997462
The two way table that correctly displays the given data is; Option B
<h3>How to Interpret Two - way Tables?</h3>
We are given that;
39 people chose chicken as the main dish,18 wanted potatoes.
32 people chose rice as a side dish, 6 chose fish as the main dish.
A total of 8 people chose a vegetarian meal with potatoes,
A total of 10 people chose fish as their main dish.
From the given parameters above, when we look at all the 4 two way tables attached in the image, we will see that only the second option is the correct one.
Read more about two way tables at; brainly.com/question/16148316
#SPJ
As for the main disadvantage: the media need revenue. Revenue tends to be tied to reporting more dramatic events. In absence of truly dramatic events, the media develop tendency to "dramatize" (especially when it gets to political events). As a result we are observing what is usually called polarization. Media to the left and right of the center will tend to amplify certain aspects of reality. Viewers will then tend to focus on sources matching their own (political) affinities. Media source thus develop their own virtually separate audiences. A cycle of polarization emerges.
This is obviously bad for democracy which is based on the principle of educated decision making by every citizen. Citizenship has been more and more polarized and their decision making on issues delineated by political boundaries. Clustering is a problem. For instance, someone who cares about protecting the environment faces a decision whether to join a cluster of political views that include environmental protections (but also other views lumped together with environmentalism by the process of polarization), or completely stay away from that topic. That is bad for democracy.
The moment you see a person pronounced guilty vs. not-guilty by a vote that almost exactly splits down by the political affiliation of the voters, we know we are having a problem.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
This answer provides the <u>weakest</u> support for the point because it states a drug that was proven safe for humans but unsafe for animals, and the point states that animal tests do not reveal if a drug will also be safe for humans. That being said, is answer choice is the exact opposite of what the point is stating, making it the weakest support.
The explicit rule for this geometric sequence 29,23,2,6, is n = 29 × (29/23)^(n - 1)
<h3>How to write explicit rule</h3>
Second term, a×r = 23
23 = 29 × r
23 = 29r
r = 29/23
The explicit formula is given by
nth term = ar^(n - 1)
n = 29 × (29/23)^(n - 1)
Where,
nth term = number of terms
Learn more about explicit rule:
brainly.com/question/1967176
