1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Slav-nsk [51]
3 years ago
12

How did his defeat in russia change napoleons fortunes

History
1 answer:
serg [7]3 years ago
7 0
The defeat changes his fortunes because: <span>In addition to losing many of his troops, his empire turned against him.

The military advance toward the Russian Empire was regarded as a very reckless move by Napoleon because the Russian had a lot more military personnel compared to the French. The defeat tainted Napoleon's reputation as a military strategist and it led to his downfall. </span>
You might be interested in
Identify one factor that contributed to the decline of the Islamic empires. Provide one historical example to support your claim
maksim [4K]

Answer:

The interference of European nations

Explanation:

The ottoman empire collapsing after the first world War

3 0
2 years ago
What was the soviet union doing in eastern europe
USPshnik [31]
North America perceived the soviet as cultural and a economic threat
7 0
3 years ago
Why did colonists feel the Articles of Confederation were necessary even though the Declaration of Independence was already writ
Finger [1]

<em>D. The Declaration of Independence outlined a relationship between individuals and the government but did not detail the power and control of that government.</em>

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation was known for its many weaknesses. It gave little to no power to the central government, which made Americans eventually uneasy and lead to the creation of the Declaration of Independence.

The Articles was very weak and granted the central government barely any power that it needed. The government could not tax the states, they had to out right ask the states for money. This lead to the United States not being able to pay off war debts, or other important things that were valuable to keeping up a country. The government also couldn't regulate trade, which was very important during this time and keep up the wealth and importance of the United States. They also couldn't do things such as enforcing laws and passing new laws, they needed many of the states approval before doing anything.

The people who were in support of creating a new constitution were the Federalists, but those who wanted to keep a small government were called Anti-Federalists. Anti-Federalists were most likely scared of a big government because they didn't want the government to abuse their power. They didn't want a repeat of what happened with Great Britain, with "<em>taxation without representation</em>" and not letting people voice opinions, practice different religions, or pass absurd laws that would overall damage individuals. Federalists felt that keeping the government this way was hurting the United States and they should be represented by a big government, obviously not one that was abusive, but one that could get things done while still having the people in mind.

When the Declaration of Independence was created, most of the people focused on the relationship between the government and the people, as it was a hot topic in the past. Many people wanted to make sure the government would not get out of hand and to maintain the good relationship between having a bigger government and the wishes of the American citizens.

Many people also felt that the Articles of Confederation was still needed, as that properly dictated how much power the government could hold, while the Declaration of Independence mostly focused on the relationship between the individuals and the government.

3 0
3 years ago
This sentence is from which of the following? If anyone bring an accusation of any crime before the elders, and does not prove w
Elena-2011 [213]

The Code of Hammurabi: Hammurabi's Code of Laws

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
the case National Association of the advancement of colored people versus Alabama 1958 struck down which limitation on the right
Sedaia [141]

The 1958 case NAACP v. Alabama struck down the requirement that organizations provide membership lists to the government on the basis of freedom of association. The court reasoned that in this case, requiring the NAACP to disclose their membership to the state of Alabama violated the 14th Amendment.



5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In the mid-1800s, how did American Indians often react to the US government signing treaties with tribal chiefs to establish res
    11·2 answers
  • Mary settlers from diferent parts of Europe decided to move to the Middle Colonies because
    7·1 answer
  • Where do we derive the term Indian giver.... help me please..!
    14·1 answer
  • Asoka it best known as the monarch of india who
    7·1 answer
  • In order to win support for the constitution what did the fed retaliate promise to add
    12·2 answers
  • How can life expectancy and infant mortality be used to evaluate a nation’s health care system?
    13·2 answers
  • How did Spanish developer Pedro De castañeda describe the high plains of Texas
    6·2 answers
  • What did zen Buddhism contribute to Japanese culture
    15·2 answers
  • What did Joseph McCarthy personally stand to gain from his anti-communist campaign?
    5·1 answer
  • In a complete paragraph, citing evidence from the text on page 239, summarize
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!