How many different nations got involved with the Korean war?

1 answer:

7 0

A total of six different nations got involved with the Korean War, namely North Korea, South Korea, the US, the UK, China and the Soviet Union.

<h3>Nations involved in the Korean War</h3>

In 1945, Korea was divided into two regions, one controlled by the US, to the south, the other controlled by the Soviet Union, to the north. The region controlled by the US was invaded by the north in 1950. That is when the Korean War started.

The two regions, now North Korea and South Korea, were supported by a couple of countries each. While China and the Soviet Union helped North Korea, the US and the UK supported South Korea. The war ended in 1953, but the two regions remain divided into two countries.

As we can see, a total of six countries got involved in the Korean War. The answer provided above is correct.

Learn more about the Korean War here:

brainly.com/question/1178880

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

Why were keel-boats and flatboats important to the early settlers?

Vikki [24]

The answer is B. Because this was their transport to get round coastlines and down rivers.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How does this photograph reflect the Tiananmen Square incident?

MariettaO [177]

The photograph above speaks about the Tianamen square incident in a way that it<span> shows the determination of the protestors and how the Chinese military overwhelmed them - as seen with the humongous tanks and one protestor bravely standing before them.</span>

5 0

3 years ago

Need help on These I’ll give you brainliest

JulsSmile [24]

Q1. D) Treaty of versilles

Q2.B) Japan

Q3.A) Fascism

Q4.C) Nazi

Q5.E) Hitler

I hope this is what you are looking for.

3 0

2 years ago

2.2. Which of the following statements describes how Percy feels about his mom? * (1 Punto) A. He thinks she is a wonderful pers

Stells [14]

Answer:

she is a hard worker and a good mother

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Please helppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp

Katena32 [7]

Answer: I'm balanced I agree and disagree here is why,

Peter C. Perdue's China Marches West argues that the Qing dynasty's ability to break through historical territorial barriers on China's northwestern frontier reflected greater Manchu familiarity with steppe culture than their Chinese predecessors had exhibited, reinforced by superior commercial, technical, and symbolic resources and the benefits of a Russian alliance. Qing imperial expansion illustrated patterns of territorial consolidation apparent as well in Russia's forward movement in Inner Asia and, ironically, in the heroic, if ultimately futile, projects of the western Mongols who fell victim to the Qing. After summarizing Perdue's thesis, this essay extends his comparisons geographically and chronologically to argue that between 1600 and 1800 states ranging from western Europe through Japan to Southeast Asia exhibited similar patterns of political and cultural integration and that synchronized integrative cycles across Eurasia extended from the ninth to the nineteenth centuries. Yet in its growing vulnerability to Inner Asian domination, China proper—along with other sectors of the "exposed zone" of Eurasia—exemplified a species of state formation that was reasonably distinct from trajectories in sectors of Eurasia that were protected against Inner Asian conquest.

5 0

2 years ago