Answer:
Rights are natural and are endowed by the very nature of our existence. It then follows that we cannot be separated from them, they are inalienable. Rights can be abused, restricted in their use or made ineffective but they cannot be removed. A person can be punished for saying something unpopular but short of killing him that person can still say whatever he wants. Since a right is inalienable, it cannot be separated from a person that person cannot transfer it either. What would be the point after all since everyone is equally endowed with the same natural rights.
If that is understood then everything else conferred on us by society then should be recognized as privilege. The first right that applies to your question is the right to equitable treatment. Even the poorest has equal claim on services that are available. The second right in play here is the right to aquire property and to be secure in its ownership. When any outside force whether it is your neighbor or the government attempts to tresspass on your ownership of the property it is theft and a violation of the owner's rights.
To claim the poorest person has a right to services, equitable treatment sustains that right. But to claim that a person who cannot pay for that service but is entitled to it at another's expense is theft.
<h3>
<u>PLEASE</u><u> MARK</u><u> ME</u><u> BRAINLIEST</u></h3>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The term node in this context basically refers to a series or groups of points in a graph, phrase markers, or a tree.
It is noteworthy that two or more nodes are referred to as daughters of another node in P-marker when if and only if the nodes in consideration (eg T, Q, R) are immediately dominated by another (M), which is called the mother node.
1. you like pizza, right?
1. you like pizza, don't you?
Answer:
See explanation for answer.
Explanation:
Metaphors:
Your eyes are as brighter than the light
Your hair is as dark as the night
Smilies:
You’re a rose yet I’m the thorns
You’re a blue sky but I’m the storm
Repetition:
I might never meet someone like you again
Guess that’s my fault, I’ll explain things then
Someone like you again
Alliteration:
Please give poor girls like me protection
Pacing in the corner with no direction
Personification:
As raindrops danced down my windshield
Guess I messed up again, not surprised then
Side Notes:
Yes, this is my original work. I'm sorry that it's not 18 lines long and the alliteration should probably be re-configured. Also, if you are a guy you definitely will need to change some of the lines and the pronouns used.
I hope I helped!
Have a lovely day!
Answer:
The voice will become controlled and distant because there are rules to follow.
Explanation:
As the name suggests, the free verse format is where the poem does not have any specific meter form, rhyme, style in it. In simple words, this type of poem has no limitations on how it is written or composed.
On the other hand, controlled forms such as the sonnet are poetry forms where there are certain rules to be followed like specific line numbers, certain rhyme schemes, and follow a certain pattern of meter forms, etc.
So, if a poet's voice is to be changed from a free verse to a controlled form such as the sonnet, the voice will become more controlled and deviate from the free form. It will be more distant as there are certain rules that the poet has to follow.
Thus, the correct answer is the first option.
