India is suddenly in the news for all the wrong reasons. It is now hitting the headlines as one of the most unequal countries in the world, whether one measures inequality on the basis of income or wealth.
So how unequal is India? As the economist Branko Milanovic says: “The question is simple, the answer is not.” Based on the new India Human Development Survey (IHDS), which provides data on income inequality for the first time, India scores a level of income equality lower than Russia, the United States, China and Brazil, and more egalitarian than only South Africa.
According to a report by the Johannesburg-based company New World Wealth, India is the second-most unequal country globally, with millionaires controlling 54% of its wealth. With a total individual wealth of $5,600 billion, it’s among the 10 richest countries in the world – and yet the average Indian is relatively poor.
Compare this with Japan, the most equal country in the world, where according to the report millionaires control only 22% of total wealth.
In India, the richest 1% own 53% of the country’s wealth, according to the latest data from Credit Suisse. The richest 5% own 68.6%, while the top 10% have 76.3%. At the other end of the pyramid, the poorer half jostles for a mere 4.1% of national wealth.
What’s more, things are getting better for the rich. The Credit Suisse data shows that India’s richest 1% owned just 36.8% of the country’s wealth in 2000, while the share of the top 10% was 65.9%. Since then they have steadily increased their share of the pie. The share of the top 1% now exceeds 50%.
This is far ahead of the United States, where the richest 1% own 37.3% of total wealth. But India’s finest still have a long way to go before they match Russia, where the top 1% own a stupendous 70.3% of the country’s wealth.
Answer:
pretty sure Tom Garner found shards of pottery and artifacts that were able to be seen from the street.
Explanation:
I hope this helps or sum lol
The correct answer is the Extinction behavior.
In psychology, extinction is seen in both operantly adapted and conditioned molded conduct. At the point when operant conduct that has been beforehand fortified never again delivers fortifying results the conduct bit by bit quits happening. In classical conditioning, when an adapted jolt is displayed alone, with the goal that it never again predicts the happening to the unconditioned boost, molded reacting bit by bit stops.
Answer – Political and legal institutions
In the ancient times, the responsibility to maintain and
foster societal order was solely a function of the family, but in modern times,
this responsibility has shifted to the government through the <span>political
(Executive and Legislature) and legal (Judiciary) institutions.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
In 1919, the 19th Amendment passed the House of Representatives. By 1920, the Senate passed it and at least 2/3 of the states ratified it. This amendment stated that the right to vote cannot be denied because of a person's sex. It gave <u>women</u> the right to vote after an exhausting, arduous, and prolonged struggle for suffrage (the right to vote).
Based on the information above, the best answer choice is <u>D. Women</u>
