Answer:
It is based on dogmatism.
Explanation:
While Skepticism is a term in philosophy, which is considered as a behavior, or a form of doubt in relation to the truth of a particular thing or situation. It stated that absolute certain knowledge is impossible.
On the other hand, Unmitigated skepticism which is a form of skepticism, claims that categorically and dogmatically it knows that no one knows anything. This appears contradictory and apparently self-defeating.
Hence, among some of the reasons why unmitigated skepticism is difficult for a person to consistently hold as a serious philosophical position is because it dogmatically accept a position or knowledge that no one knows anything, which is self-defeating and contradictory.
Answer:
Athens: a city-state of Ancient Greece that was the first to have democracy...
Council of 500: In Athens, a group of 500 citizens chosen...
Council of Elders: a small group of spartans who made all the important governing decisions
Sparta: A city state in Ancient Greece known for its military oligarchy
agora: a market place in Ancient Greece
Capable: having the ability or skill necessary to do something well
Peloponnesus: a peninsula....
helot: a slave in Sparta
eliminate: to completely remove or put an end to something
High standards of living are defined when defining the state of evolution of the society
- in different periods of time considering cultural peculiarities
- comparing two by two of above mentioned states?
- considering the most important standards for a good living
So, we could say japan has a higher state of development then most countries cause techniquely they use their energy most efficiently, being quite a competitive part of the world
Cuba, on the other hand, lacks transparency and coordination in developing strategies , the hedonic needs being preserved and perpetuated by the cubans and the naturalised population, geopolical influences remaining to be looked into.
Answer:
d. Internal coherence demonstrates the rational relationship between parts of a hypothesis.
Explanation:
The<u> statement "d" best describes the internal coherence of a hypothesis </u>because if the different parts of a hypothesis aren't coherent with each other, aren't related, there's no internal coherence in the first place. All the different parts have to have a rational relationship, have to be rational with each other.
Answer:
d) a company offers free job related education to employees
