1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nordsb [41]
2 years ago
9

Crum Brothers Corp., a steel drum manufacturer, owned and operated a manufacturing plant in Pittsburg, Penn.. Coel Stone, the pl

ant superintendent, hired Pitt Security Patrol, Inc. (PSP), a security company, to guard CBC property and deter thieves and vandals. Some PSP security guards, as Stone knew, carried firearms. Craig Sharp, a PSP security guard, was not certified as an armed guard but nevertheless took his gun, in a briefcase, to work. While working at the CBC plant Craig fired his gun at Don Stew, a CBC employee, in the belief that Stew was an intruder. The bullet struck and killed Stew. Stew's mother filed a suit in court against CBC and others, alleging in part that her son's death was the result of PSP's negligence, for which CBC was responsible.
PLEASE USE ISSUE, RULE, ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION. I NEED THIS ANSWER FAST, THANK YOU!
Law
1 answer:
Alinara [238K]2 years ago
7 0

Using the Issue, Rule, Analysis, and Conclusion, see the analysis of the legal case indicated above.

<h3>What is the Issue?</h3>

As already given, Additional security officers were engaged to defend the steel mill from thieves and vandals, as previously stated. CBC management was also aware that the security guards possessed weapons, which they were meant to employ for CBC protection.

The primary goal of recruiting more guards was to defend CBC from external threats.

<h3>What was the rule?</h3>

The responsibility for confirming that the hired guards were:

  • trained for the circumstance and
  • were legally permitted to carry and use weapons in a crisis situation like this;

was that of CBC

Both PSP and CBC were entirely negligent in failing to check and regulate the scenario in which a security guard who was not qualified as an armed guard nonetheless carried the pistol.

<h3>What is the Analysis?</h3>

Unauthorized employees carrying firearms are automatically breaking the law and endangering their own and others' safety.

Also, once CBC discovered that guards were armed with weapons, it was their job to ensure that sufficient training is provided to their personnel and that they are familiar with the entire procedure so that they may prevent any confusion and are not perceived as a thief or a risk to others.

<h3>What is the conclusion?</h3>

Working in an atmosphere prone to theft and vandalism necessitated more security and armed guards, which was an inherently risky circumstance, especially when uncertified guards were deployed with guns.

However, both parties (PSP and CBC) were negligent.

Learn more about Legal case analysis at:

brainly.com/question/25903338

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Which matches which?????????
Free_Kalibri [48]

Answer:g7h6f5e4d3b2a1

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Why should you stay out of the no-zone of a large truck?
Archy [21]

Answer:

You should do this because trucks are heavier and more difficult to maneuver than a regular vehicle, thus you must take extra caution when driving near them to prevent serious injuries or sometimes death.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the Dodd-Frank Act amend the Investment Advisers Act?
alexgriva [62]

It was amended with the intent to:

1. To promote the financial stability of the US

2. To improve the accountability and transparency of the fin'l system

3. End "TOO BIG TO FAIL"

4. End bailouts (Chrysler, GM, & Goldman Sachs)

5. To protect consumers from abusive financial services practices.

6 0
2 years ago
The type of Congress established in Article 1, Section 1 of the US Constitution, is
yulyashka [42]
Bicameral because of the two houses currently in congress
6 0
3 years ago
Is there a time you felt as if you needed to fix your attitude?
BabaBlast [244]

Answer:yes here are some ways to do so

1)Always act with a purpose. 2)Stretch yourself past your limits every day. ... 3)Take action without expecting results. ... Use setbacks to improve your skills. ... Seek out those who share your positive attitude. ... Don't take yourself so seriously. ... Forgive the limitations of others.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • When there is flooding and you see pooled water, what should you do?
    15·1 answer
  • What did Oliver Wendal Holmes say limits free speech​
    15·1 answer
  • A person commits an offense if the person drives a vehicle in willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property.
    8·1 answer
  • Who does an agent represent during the solicitation of insurance
    14·1 answer
  • Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly.
    6·1 answer
  • What is a punitive penalty ordered by the court after a defendant has been convicted of a crime, either by a jury, a bench trial
    12·1 answer
  • Why does Hertzberg regard capital punishment as a uniquely American brand of sadism?
    5·1 answer
  • When a contract is completed to the satisfaction of both parties, it is said to
    9·1 answer
  • What formal power would the president use to enact an economic stimulus bill?
    6·1 answer
  • What are the two branches of public safety in the United States?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!