1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nordsb [41]
2 years ago
9

Crum Brothers Corp., a steel drum manufacturer, owned and operated a manufacturing plant in Pittsburg, Penn.. Coel Stone, the pl

ant superintendent, hired Pitt Security Patrol, Inc. (PSP), a security company, to guard CBC property and deter thieves and vandals. Some PSP security guards, as Stone knew, carried firearms. Craig Sharp, a PSP security guard, was not certified as an armed guard but nevertheless took his gun, in a briefcase, to work. While working at the CBC plant Craig fired his gun at Don Stew, a CBC employee, in the belief that Stew was an intruder. The bullet struck and killed Stew. Stew's mother filed a suit in court against CBC and others, alleging in part that her son's death was the result of PSP's negligence, for which CBC was responsible.
PLEASE USE ISSUE, RULE, ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION. I NEED THIS ANSWER FAST, THANK YOU!
Law
1 answer:
Alinara [238K]2 years ago
7 0

Using the Issue, Rule, Analysis, and Conclusion, see the analysis of the legal case indicated above.

<h3>What is the Issue?</h3>

As already given, Additional security officers were engaged to defend the steel mill from thieves and vandals, as previously stated. CBC management was also aware that the security guards possessed weapons, which they were meant to employ for CBC protection.

The primary goal of recruiting more guards was to defend CBC from external threats.

<h3>What was the rule?</h3>

The responsibility for confirming that the hired guards were:

  • trained for the circumstance and
  • were legally permitted to carry and use weapons in a crisis situation like this;

was that of CBC

Both PSP and CBC were entirely negligent in failing to check and regulate the scenario in which a security guard who was not qualified as an armed guard nonetheless carried the pistol.

<h3>What is the Analysis?</h3>

Unauthorized employees carrying firearms are automatically breaking the law and endangering their own and others' safety.

Also, once CBC discovered that guards were armed with weapons, it was their job to ensure that sufficient training is provided to their personnel and that they are familiar with the entire procedure so that they may prevent any confusion and are not perceived as a thief or a risk to others.

<h3>What is the conclusion?</h3>

Working in an atmosphere prone to theft and vandalism necessitated more security and armed guards, which was an inherently risky circumstance, especially when uncertified guards were deployed with guns.

However, both parties (PSP and CBC) were negligent.

Learn more about Legal case analysis at:

brainly.com/question/25903338

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Which headline best reflects the Miranda v. Arizona decision?
Flauer [41]

Answer:

2) Supreme Court Denies Privacy Rights Of Students

Explanation:

right answer i guessed it on a test and got it correct.

8 0
3 years ago
Bob called Kevin and told him he would sell 10 of his baseball cards for $50.
Natasha2012 [34]

Answer:5

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Dawn was driving down the road when she spotted a one-car accident and a woman named Sarah on the side of the road. Dawn stopped
vazorg [7]

Answer:

c. Dawn would have been obligated to assist Sarah under the European bystander rule

Explanation:

The bystander rule is a type of rule which states that a person generally has no legal obligation to rescue, save or assist another (victim) who is in danger or at risk, even if the society imposes a moral responsibility to act as such.

This is known as the American bystander rule and is opposite from the European rule which mandates intervention and assistance, the European version of this rule is called the Good Samaritan rule

so under the European bystander/Good Samaritan rule, Dawn would have been obligated to assist Sarah.

6 0
3 years ago
In September, Amina hired Bryan as a delivery man. Bryan was to commence work on 1 November. On 1 October, Amina wrote to Bryan
Tcecarenko [31]

Answer: The answer is explained below

Explanation:

A layoff is a termination of an employment at the employer's will. A layoff may be either temporary or permanent and can occur for reasons such as new technology, downsizing, or changes in market conditions. In this case with regards to the question, Amina told Bryan that his service is no longer needed due to an economic circumstances. While accepting and signing a job offer, there are legal agreement which has to be made.

Here,an anticipatory breach occurs when Amina states, in advance of the due date that Bryan was meant to start the job that she intends not fulfilling the agreement of having him as a delivery man.

In this situation, Bryan can't sue Amina because it wasn't her fault that an economic situation arises. If he had left a previous job to take Amina's offer, that could have been a different case.

According to the labour welfare law, in case any employer rejects the job offer the individual can raise a concern against him. An economic conditions can come up anytime so Bryan shouldn't sue Amina.

5 0
3 years ago
(ASAP 100 POINTS AND BRAINLIEST) To what extent, if any, do jury trials ensure due process as stated in the Constitution and Bil
vagabundo [1.1K]

Answer:

The Fifth Amendment says to the federal government that no one shall be "deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law."

The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Article 1 Section 8 of the United States Constitution gives Congress the power to: Select one: a. Enact income taxes and excise
    15·1 answer
  • Why did the second continental congress, when drafting the articles of confederation, create a weak central government?
    6·2 answers
  • Please help me and answer #2 thank you!
    15·1 answer
  • 5. Which of the following is the best definition of
    6·2 answers
  • 5. Which set of events is in correct chronological order?
    14·1 answer
  • Should Cuomo resign or not and why?
    15·1 answer
  • ***50 POINTS***One question*** <br> What is the difference between Procedural and Substantive laws?
    13·2 answers
  • What are the five basic freedoms guaranteed by the first amendment?
    5·1 answer
  • Postal inspection service opportunities for advancement to different units within this agency
    12·1 answer
  • Document the incident to
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!