Answer:
False
Explanation:
In a command or planned economy, the factors of production are owned and controlled by the government. The government makes all the significant economic decisions such as production, distribution, and pricing.
The government prepares a central plan for the entire economy. The plan determines the production level, the goods and services to be produced, and their prices. The central government employs all workers. The private sector does not exist.
Answer:
frictional unemployment created by sectoral shifts.
Explanation:
This unemployment is generated because the information between vacancies for the labor force is imperfect. People study and prepare to be dental hygienists or bookbinders without information for the total amount of vacancies that will occur. This frictional unemployment will decrease once the labor force adjust for the demand changes in the jobs. Because the shortage, the salaries for dental hygienists will increase and more people will start studies for dental hygienists. The opposite will occur with the bookbinders job, the decrease in the demand will lower the wages and less people will dive into.
Skin antisepsis kits having alcohol and chlorhexidine gluconate or tincture of iodine are associated with low rates of blood culture contamination.
<h3>Skin antisepsis kits</h3>
Skin preparation is an important factor in declining the rate of blood culture contamination. We evaluated blood culture contamination rates associated with the use of skin antisepsis kits including either 2% alcoholic chlorhexidine gluconate or 2% alcoholic tincture of iodine.
Contamination of blood cultures is a typical problem, with rates for organizations ranging from 2% to more than 6%. Most contaminants produced from blood cultures are indigenous human microbial flora. Careful skin practice is an important factor in reducing the rate of blood culture contamination.
To learn more about blood culture contamination visit the link
brainly.com/question/1426959
#SPJ4
<u>The reason that Pablo Picasso, become wealthy during his lifetime and the artist, Vincent van Gogh, remain poor his entire life:</u>
Pablo Picasso and Vincent van Gogh had more features in common. They had unanimously indistinct style of arts which had become immediately identifiable.
In spite of all that, Picasso died as a rich man owning an estate which is estimated at nearly 750 million dollar whereas Van Gogh died as a pauper.
Studies claim that the reason behind this would be that, Van Gogh remained to be a loner and socially inactive. He was depending on his brother to meet the social world and in contrast Picasso was a charismatic active member in various social clubs where her had multiple number of contacts and connections.
It's been said that Pablo Picasso was a hub who had a vast network of social lines and Vincent Van Gogh was a silent or solitary node.
But now, the paintings of both the greatest artists were well spoken and sell for more than 100,000,000 US Dollars.
