Answer:
C. Statute of limitations.
Explanation:
Statute of limitations are laws which states the time limit of when legal proceedings must be initiated between concerned parties from the date in which alleged offence was perpetrated.
In statue of limitations, the time limit for somebody is wronged to initiate legal action is not fixed in all jurisdiction. It means that depending on the nature of the alleged offense under statute of limitation, time allowed to institute legal actions varies.
Example of statue of limitation is that for certain states, the time limit to initiate legal case say on fraud is two years. It means that one must bring up the case in a court of law within the stipulated two years period. Once the two year grace elapse, one can no longer sue for fraud in the court of law.
Although there is no time limit for certain offence like murder case, sex offence with minor etc.
As in the case above, the judge threw away the case because according to the law of statute of limitation, a party that is wronged can only sue the wrong doer within the stipulated time as spelt out within the jurisdiction where the alleged offence was committed.
Answer:
The correct answer is A) top quality.
Explanation:
There are generally two sales approaches: the first, product-oriented. This takes into account its own characteristics in terms of presentation, quality and utility; and the second, people-oriented, where the real needs of the consumer are studied to determine how he uses the good in order to orient himself towards satisfying a need.
The example clearly shows that the orientation with minimum unit costs was mainly focused on the client, so that the first impression is that of a lower price to motivate their purchase decision. For his part, Orchard clearly shows a product orientation, because he tries to offer quality by sacrificing other variables to supply a need.
Answer:
PV = $155,343
Explanation:
This question requires application of PV of annuity, according to which:
PV = p [1-(1+r)^-n/r]
P= Periodic Payment
r = rate of period
n = number of periods
r = 3%/12 = 0.25% (monthly), n = 120, P = $1500
PV = 1500 * [\frac{1 - (1 + 0.0025)^{-120}}{0.0025}]
PV = 1500 * 103.5618
PV = $155,343
Answer:
Intrinsic value: $ 45.19290274
The stock is undervalued as is selling for less.
Explanation:
We use the gordon model to solve for the intrinsic value of the share.
we must solve for the grow rate like it was an interest rate:
<u>grow rate: </u>
![2.00 \times (1+g)^{10} = 3.16\\\sqrt[10]{\frac{3.16}{2.00}} -1 = g](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=2.00%20%5Ctimes%20%281%2Bg%29%5E%7B10%7D%20%3D%203.16%5C%5C%5Csqrt%5B10%5D%7B%5Cfrac%7B3.16%7D%7B2.00%7D%7D%20-1%20%3D%20g)
g = 0.046804808
<u>dividends one year from now:</u>
3.16 x (1 + 0.046804808) = 3.307903193
Now we calculate the instrinsic value:
Value: $ 45.19290274
The stock is undervalued as is selling for less.
