1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mrs_skeptik [129]
3 years ago
10

On March 2, 2015, Best Buy co. announced that it planned to repurchase up to $1 billion of its common shares. The company also a

nnounced on that day that an increase in its quarterly dividend from $0.19 to $0.23 per share, and a one-time special dividend of $0.51 per share. The special dividend resulted from a windfall legal settlement related to manufacture of liquid crystal displays it had sold. Which method of returning capital to investors (repurchases, regular dividends, special dividends) do you think is viewed by shareholders most favorably, and why
Business
1 answer:
abruzzese [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Follows are the solution to this question:

Explanation:

The company sold the quantum dot produce will have a huge amount of money in the company, shareholders may have differing opinions to use that money the holds the surplus. As capital becomes kept, this hardly increases the value of a business or takes the investors through their pockets.

Position of the investor on (repurchasing, earnings)

Payout and buyback of shares are considered a factor influencing shareholders' interest and some factors are based on investor interest.

Current income source

Many investors can only be the source of revenue for such investors so that they'd prefer to have a regular dividend. Then the more current revenue you earn its most beneficial is a unique dividend. Share buybacks as an opportunity to share in order to collect large sums of cash.

Productive investments value

Those who become shareholders that must increase the asset's lengthy-term price, — for example stock values by companies investing in positive NPV ventures and in this case increase the interest of existing investors.

Improved future dividend

Just after the purchase of shares in share price issuance, a number of shares will be limited, and effective dividends rise per share. It means that an investor will acquire a further equity interest in the business by buying back preferred stock.

Focused on the hypotheses of dividends, repurchases, or portion share price plus repurchases, there are many mainly three opinions.

Many people would prefer the $0.51 dividend payment as a sum of money that was received in the case of a dividend. And at the same time, there will be an idea that the dividends must be paid regularly as well as the remaining cash must buy safely.

You might be interested in
Velocity, a consulting firm, enters into a contract to help Burger Boy, a fast-food restaurant, design a marketing strategy to c
romanna [79]

Answer:

the journal entries:

to record the contract

Dr Accounts receivable 96,000

Dr Bonus receivable 2,400

    Cr Service revenue 98,400

to record adjustment of bonus receivable at month 5:

Dr Service revenue 6,400

    Cr Bonus receivable 6,400

to record service revenue for the fifth month:

Dr Accounts receivable 96,000

Dr Bonus receivable 800

    Cr Service revenue 96,800

to record getting the bonus:

Dr Cash 32,000

    Cr Bonus receivable 6,400

    Cr Service revenue 25,600

Explanation:

total value of the contract:

[($96,000 x 8) + $32,000] x 0.8 = $640,000

[($96,000 x 8) - $32,000] x 0.2 = $147,200

total expected value = $787,200

expected value of the bonus = $787,200 - ($96,000 x 8) = $19,200, monthly bonus receivable $19,200 / 8 = $2,400

the adjustments required during the fifth month:

[($96,000 x 8) + $32,000] x 0.6 = $480,000

[($96,000 x 8) - $32,000] x 0.4 = $294,400

total expected value = $774,400

expected value of the bonus = $774,400 - ($96,000 x 8) = $6,400, monthly bonus receivable $6,400 / 8 = $800

5 0
3 years ago
Wanda is faced with an ethical dilemma. She knows her supervisor, the CFO, wants to accelerate the recoding of revenue to an ear
jolli1 [7]

Answer:

Wanda is most likely to refuse.

Explanation:

The stage 4 of Kohlberg's Moral Development Model is defined as the Law and Order Orientation Stage, in which doing what is dutiful is paramount. If Wanda accepted his supervisor's demands, she would be breaking a law (the GAAP), and this act would therefore go against what the Kohlberg's model proposes. She will most likely respect the law despite the conquesequences that this might have on her personal life (for example, being fired).

5 0
3 years ago
Southern Markets has sales of $78,400, net income of $2,400, costs of goods sold of $43,100, and depreciation of $6,800. What is
Helen [10]

Answer:

36.35%

Explanation:

According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follows,

Sales = $78,400

Net income = $2,400

Cost of goods sodl = $43,100

Depreciation = $6,800

So, we can calculate the EBIT value by using following formula:

= EBIT ÷ Sales

= ($78,400  - $43,100 - $6,800) ÷ ($78,400)

= $28,500 ÷ $78,400

= 36.35%

Hence, the common-size statement value of EBIT is 36.35%

3 0
2 years ago
Ruis Corporation, a publicly held corporation, has thirty-five members on its board of directors. In order to conduct business e
Oliga [24]

Answer:

illegal

Explanation:

According to my research on the rules or regulations that a corporation must follow, it can be said that based on the information provided within the question what was done is illegal. Based on the Sarbanes-Oxley Act every entity titled as a corporation is required by law to have an audit committee. Since one was not created for the Ruis Corporation it is technically an illegal corporation.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.

6 0
2 years ago
What is Jensen's alpha of a portfolio comprised of 45 percent portfolio A and 55 percent of portfolio B? Portfolio Average Retur
inn [45]

Answer:

The Jensen's alpha of a portfolio comprised of 45 percent portfolio A and 55 percent of portfolio B = 2.04 %

Explanation:

<em>Solution</em>

Given that:

Now,

The Jensen’s alpha of a Portfolio is computed by applying  the formula  below:

Jensen's alpha = Portfolio Return − [Risk Free Rate of Return + ( Portfolio Beta * (Market Rate of Return − Risk Free Rate of Return ) ) ]

For the information given in the question we have the following,

The Risk free rate of return = 3. 1%

In order to find the Jensen’s alpha we have to first get the following from the information given in the question :

1. Portfolio Return

2. Portfolio Beta

3.Market Rate of Return

Thus,

(A)Calculation of Portfolio Return :

The formula for calculation of Portfolio Return is  given as:

E(RP) = ( RA * WA )+ ( RB * WB )

Where

E(RP) = Portfolio Return

RA = Average Return of Portfolio A ; WA = Weight of Investment in Portfolio A

RB = Average Return of Portfolio B ;  WB = Weight of Investment in Portfolio B

For the information given in the question we have the following:

RA = 18.9 %, WA = 45 % = 0.45, RB = 13.2 %,  WB = 55 % = 0.55

By applying the values in the formula we have

= ( 18.9 % * 0.45 ) + ( 13.2 % * 0.55 )

= 8.5050 % + 7.2600 % = 15.7650 %

(B). Calculation of Portfolio Beta:

Now,

The formula for calculating the Portfolio Beta is

ΒP = [ ( WA * βA ) + ( WB * βB ) ]

Where,

βP = Portfolio Beta

WA = Weight of Investment in Portfolio A = 45 % = 0.45 ; βA = Beta of Portfolio A = 1.92

WB = Weight of Investment in Portfolio B = 55 % = 0.55 ; βB = Beta of Portfolio B = 1.27

By Applying the above vales in the formula we have

= ( 0.45 * 1.92 )   + ( 0.55 * 1.27 )

= 0.8640 + 0.6985

= 1.5625

(C). Calculation of Market rate of return :

Now,

The Market Risk Premium = Market rate of return - Risk free rate

From the Information given in the Question we have

The Market Risk Premium = 6.8 %

Risk free rate = 3. 1 %

Market rate of return = To find

Then

By applying the above information in the Market Risk Premium formula we have

6.8 % = Market rate of Return - 3.1 %

Thus Market rate of return = 6.8 % + 3.1 % = 9.9 %

So,

From the following  information, we gave

Risk free rate of return = 3.1% ; Portfolio Return = 15.7650 %

The Portfolio Beta = 1.5625 ; Market Rate of Return = 9.9 %

Now

Applying the above values in the Jensen’s Alpha formula we have

The Jensen's alpha = Portfolio Return − [Risk Free Rate of Return + ( Portfolio Beta * (Market Rate of Return − Risk Free Rate of Return )) ]

= 15.7650 % - [ 3.1 % + ( 1.5625 * ( 9.9 % - 3.1 % ) ) ]

= 15.7650 % - [ 3.1 % + ( 1.5625 * 6.8 % ) ]                  

= 15.7650 % - [ 3.1 % + 10.6250 % ]

= 15.7650 % - 13.7250 %

= 2.0400 %

= 2.04 % ( when rounded off to two decimal places )

Therefore, the Jensen's alpha of a portfolio comprised of 45 percent portfolio A and 55 percent of portfolio B = 2.04 %

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When a firm's sales revenues are greater than its expenses, the firm has a:
    14·1 answer
  • What is rent in personal finance ?
    10·1 answer
  • Kate holds a middle-management position with a large corporation. She prefers to involve her subordinates in decision making. Sh
    13·1 answer
  • Asset retirement obligations:
    7·1 answer
  • King Costume uses a periodic inventory system. The company started the month with 6 masks in its beginning inventory that cost $
    12·1 answer
  • Barriers to International Trade Countries often use various government regulations to manipulate the amount of goods and service
    6·1 answer
  • What form do some schools, especially private schools, use in addition to the FAFSA to determine how to award aid? A) FAFSA II B
    12·1 answer
  • 15 POINTS
    15·1 answer
  • QUESTION 9 of 10: You bid $111 per room per night for 40 guests for one night. The meeting planner says you've got the business
    10·2 answers
  • If someone is discriminated by a law based on gender, the burden is on the state to show that the law is substantially related t
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!