Answer:
In both these early ventures the Canadian people and their government were giving bold to the United States, has not believed in divorcing these lines of business. Also been commonly public enterprises from the time they were first installed. The collapse of the grain market shattered the foundations of their economic life.
Explanation:
If the results of a experiment do not support the hypothesis this does not necessarily mean that the experiment was a failure or that the hypothesis was wrong, but simply that the test that was conducted did not find results that were significant and also showed that the "null hypothesis" was incorrect. Therefore, if a hypothesis is shown to be inaccurate by a particular experiment the issue might need further experimentation because it could be wrong or it could not, but this does not mean the experiment was a failure. In fact proving a hypothesis can be informative for conducting further experiments to conclude what caused the phenomena if not the original hypothesis.
<span>Michael is most likely to experience "</span>role conflict".
A role conflict refers to a situation when someone has to perform to roles in any capacity which affect each other, for example if there is an employer who has to fire one of his employee who also is a close friend that will put the employer in the situation of the role conflict. In the above case Michael experience role conflict as a Church member and as an employee.
Barbour and Wright maintain that when the Supreme Court issues a ruling on the constitutionality of a particular bureaucratic regulation, they are "piecemeal".
<u>Explanation:</u>
It is a piecemeal approach accompanied by unsystematic, partial actions taken over periods. A piecemeal judgment is a document provided by an external auditor expressing a view confined to particular line elements within the financial statements of a corporation. In a situation where complete information is not accessible, an auditor can offer a piecemeal opinion.
For an instance, the defendants pursued a piecemeal investigation strategy in the patent infringement case, examining only the records of selected corporate employees. The district court stated that the method was contradictory to the Federal regulations of Civil Procedure and repeated court orders.
