<u>Answer:</u>
This case was not meant to be a precedent and It was decided in a 5–4 vote.
Option: (A) and (B)
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The Bush v/s Gore case of 2000 was unusual because the Supreme Court decision in the case ordering the initial count to be considered as final brought a wave of mixed responses throughout the United States.
- The decision was voted 5-4 by the Supreme Court bench of 9 justices hearing the case.
- The critics interpreted from the judgment issued that the case was not meant to be taken as a precedent for any cases in the future.
Answer:yes send a copy of their formed consent via facsimile To the subject's wife and after she has had an opportunity to speak to the investigator, she can sign the informed consent and send it back to you.
Explanation: the man should not be exempted from the trail because his wife is not around to sign up the consent form. Faxing it is a better and quicker way to get the wife's consent because this trial may help her husband. And also a waver of consent will not also be given by the IRB and verbal approval by the wife is not acceptable legally. The best way is still faxing it to the wife and she has done her own background check she can sign it and fax it back via facsimile also.
Answer:
overconfidence
Explanation:
overconfidence
it is feeling of misjudgment about own ability. when someone think more than his/her ability. it is effect of higher expectation then the person normally have.
overconfidence lead to confusion and unsuccessful. it is effect that sometimes blurred the original outcomes and frame the outcomes which is not possible according to the particular situation.
Held by someone who raises additional points of view presenting information not contained in the briefs of the formal parties.
