The argument that James is making in this speech kings are god’s representatives on earth and should not be challenged. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is the argument?</h3>
Generally, the argument is simply defined as a hot or furious discourse of opposing or divergent viewpoints.
In conclusion, In this lecture, James argues that monarchs are god's ambassadors on Earth and should not be disputed.
Read more about the argument
brainly.com/question/9860191
#SPJ1
Answer:
1. Ang hindi tumingin sa pinanggalingan ay parang kinalimutan mona ang iyong sarili.
2. kasiyahan o kawilihan ng isang babae o sa kanyang paghalakhak ay para na siyang naghahanap ng mapapangasawa.
3. Kung ano ang lagi mong sinasabi ay ito ang iyong nararamdaman
4. kung ano ang ating pinapakita o ginagawa ay may karampatan na kinahihinatnan.
5. Hindi niya ginagamit ang sariling utak at nadidiktahan na lamang ng kung anu-anong naririnig.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
In the American election campaigns in the 19th century, "waving the bloody shirt" was a phrase used to ridicule opposing politicians who made emotional calls to avenge the blood of the northern soldiers that died in the Civil War.
Booker T. Washington said the African American people should prove they were worthy of the rights that the white men had, while Du Bois said they should demand those rights immediatly. Plz mark brainliest.