Thomas Jefferson opposed the alien and sedition Acts passed by the Federalist Congress, because towards the elections of 1796 the candidate that won the elections was the Federalist John Adams and his party.
In my opinion, George Washington's Farewell Address was a fair and clear warning against political parties/alliances. The reason being is because, having all these alliances and political parties would cause a war. If everyone stated their opinions, and someone doesn't like it, then they will fight about it until the conflict is resolved. Republicans formed a number of societies and clubs throughout the nation, which spread criticism of Washington's political decisions. This caused the birth of the Republican Party after Thomas Jefferson resigned from Washington's cabinet. Washington was against the Federalists which caused a little conflict with the Republican Party. Further more, more evidence provides that Washington's address was a fair warning, due to the fact that more conflict grew in his later term of presidency. Battles raged in the press, attacking one's political views. All in all, i would say that Washington's Farewell Address was a fair, and clear warning. It was correct in my opinion. hope this helped, have an amazing day :)<span />
There were several important factors that contributed to the ability of europeans to conquer the aztecs and inca, but the most important three were that the Europeans brought guns, germs, and steel weapons.
Answer:The Constitution of the United States said little about religion. ... the Constitution did not prohibit the kind of state-supported religion that had flourished ... alone, which can establish the Principles upon which Freedom can securely stand. ... potential critics who might claim religious discrimination in eligibility for public office.
Explanation:
The Constitution of the United States said little about religion. ... the Constitution did not prohibit the kind of state-supported religion that had flourished ... alone, which can establish the Principles upon which Freedom can securely stand. ... potential critics who might claim religious discrimination in eligibility for public office.
