1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
romanna [79]
2 years ago
12

Supporters of the spoils system claimed it made government more efficient because like-minded individuals cooperated. Opponents

claimed it made government less efficient because
A. officials did little work.
B. the followers of the loyal party did not cooperate.
C. no officials were worthy of office.
D. many experienced officials left office after each election.
History
2 answers:
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]2 years ago
8 0

The opposition of spoil system claimed it made government less efficient because the followers of the loyal party did not cooperate.

<h3>What is the spoil system?</h3>

This refers to the practice of a successful political party which they gives their public office to its supporters.

However, the opposition of spoil system claimed it made government less efficient because the followers of the loyal party did not cooperate.

Therefore, the Option B is correct.

Read more about spoil system

<em>brainly.com/question/14025144</em>

#SPJ1

rewona [7]2 years ago
6 0

Opponents of the spoils system claimed it made government less efficient because D. many experienced officials left office after each election.

<h3>What is the spoils system?</h3>

The spoils system was the reward with government positions given to political loyalists and friends after winning elections.  The spoils system was a creation of President Andrew Jackson.

The spoils system displaced qualified, competent, and experienced officials, who must leave office after each election to make way for political loyalists.

The fallouts of the spoils system were widespread incompetence and corruption in government offices.

Thus, while supporters of the spoils system claimed it engendered cooperation, opponents noticed its inefficiency.

Learn more about the spoils system at brainly.com/question/20487147

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
The overall purpose of the NAACP is to<br> integrate professional sports.
Tpy6a [65]

Answer:

The over all purpose of NACCP is to…

fight for the civil rights of African Americans, not to integrate professional sports.

7 0
3 years ago
What do the nolan charts two axis represent ?
Fynjy0 [20]

What the Nolan Chart's two axes represent is:

b. Personal economic freedom.

This chart, which was created by David Nolan in 1969, divides human political view into two axes: economic opinion and personal opinion, creating something similar to a Chartesian chart.

Those poltical parties on the right of the Chart, tend to favour more economic intervention in personal matters such as drug laws. On the other hand, those to the left, tend to favour more government control in economics. For instance, when governent establishes a minimum wage.



4 0
3 years ago
Who was the only person to win a Nobel Prize in two different fields?
qwelly [4]
Marie Curie won a Nobel Prize in two different fields. Brainliest?
4 0
2 years ago
Help!!!! What did the Mexican Army think the defenders of the Alamo as?
omeli [17]

Answer:

They thought of them as criminals and bad people.

Explanation:

Mainly because Santa Anna had told them that so they would fight along side him. They didn't know who they were so they went with his word.

6 0
3 years ago
In what ways was Andrew Jackson seen as a common man
emmainna [20.7K]
Andrew Jackson's term as president (1829-1837) began a new era in American politics. For the first time in the United States history a man born in humble circumstances was now President. Politicians in the previous generations gained precedence due to their family background, wealth, prestige, and education. Families such the Adams, and the Jeffersons constituted the guidelines for political appointees. Andrew Jackson’s election showed that a mans’ lineage did not ensure a place in office. Rather it was the candidate’s ability to appeal to the voter. It was Jackson’s election that started the supposed 'age of the common man'. Jackson became the defining figure of his age due to his ability to overcome early life struggles, his military record, and his successes as an adult. Despite all his accomplishments, Jackson downplayed his past successes to suit the public's belief that Jackson was one of them. In reality Jackson was anything but common. i hope it works
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What happened in the 2000 presidential election between Bush and Gore?
    9·2 answers
  • How did Shi Huangdi's efforts strengthen the empire
    8·2 answers
  • Why did the Soviet Union put nukes in Cuba?
    11·2 answers
  • 20 Points!
    12·2 answers
  • Why did the pearl harbor attack fail to cripple America's Pacific naval fleet
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following best characterizes Herbert Hoover’s role in the great depression
    13·1 answer
  • Why do hunter-gathers take up agriculture?
    8·1 answer
  • In 1-2 compleat the sentences explain which event was a turning point in the revolutionary war for the continental army and 1 re
    7·1 answer
  • Why were the british unable to achieve success in the south during the revolutionary war?
    12·1 answer
  • Question 10 of 10
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!