Question

Supporters of the spoils system claimed it made government more efficient because like-minded individuals cooperated. Opponents claimed it made government less efficient because
A. officials did little work.
B. the followers of the loyal party did not cooperate.
C. no officials were worthy of office.
D. many experienced officials left office after each election.

Answer 1

The opposition of spoil system claimed it made government less efficient because the followers of the loyal party did not cooperate.

What is the spoil system?

This refers to the practice of a successful political party which they gives their public office to its supporters.

However, the opposition of spoil system claimed it made government less efficient because the followers of the loyal party did not cooperate.

Therefore, the Option B is correct.

Read more about spoil system

brainly.com/question/14025144

#SPJ1

Answer 2

Opponents of the spoils system claimed it made government less efficient because D. many experienced officials left office after each election.

What is the spoils system?

The spoils system was the reward with government positions given to political loyalists and friends after winning elections.  The spoils system was a creation of President Andrew Jackson.

The spoils system displaced qualified, competent, and experienced officials, who must leave office after each election to make way for political loyalists.

The fallouts of the spoils system were widespread incompetence and corruption in government offices.

Thus, while supporters of the spoils system claimed it engendered cooperation, opponents noticed its inefficiency.

Learn more about the spoils system at brainly.com/question/20487147

#SPJ1