Answer:
c. $2.44.
Explanation:
kindly check attachment for the step by step solution of the given problem.
Answer:
$75 billion
Explanation:
Recall that
Disposable Income = Personal Income - (Personal taxes + other deductions)
OR
Disposable income = Consumption + Savings.
Given that
Personal Consumption expenditure = $70 billion
Savings = $5billion
We use the second formula.
Thus,
Disposable income = 70 + 5
= 75
Hence, from the given set of data, disposable income = $75 billion.
This is not the app for this !!
Answer:
The answer is: C) He wanted to stabilize employer-employee relations.
Explanation:
Samuel Gompers worked very hard to make his beliefs and ideas "popular" not only among workers and politicians but also among corporate leaders. He was very pragmatic when dealing with politicians and management. He would sometimes support Democrats and other times Republicans. He tried to balance things out in favor of his union and himself obviously. He used his huge bargaining power to convince politicians and managers that his ideas were correct.
He didn´t support socialistic ideas in favor of destroying capitalism. He saw working for corporations as a means for employees to achieve the American dream.
Answer:
This is an example for the regulation of the government having a negative impact on trade.
The celling policy if people trade below that value is uneffective and useless but, if the agent of the market trade above the celling in some transactiosn (this book may be a best.seller or a book which is hard to find in the given moment) the regulation prohibits and no trade is done. No trade implies neither consumper or producer surplus. While the government state the celling acts in well-being and good for the consumer in this case it is proved wrongly. The consumer would pay between 59 and 64 having a surplus and the produced above 59 will also enjoy a surplus from trade.
Explanation: