Answer:
$
Market value of common stocks (6,000 x $25) = 150,000
Market value of preferred stocks (9,000 x $20) = 180,000
Market value of the company 330,000
Proceeds allocated to common stocks
= $150,000/$330,000 x $312,000
= $141,818
The correct answer is B
Explanation:
The market value of the company is the aggregate of market value of common stocks and market value of preferred stocks.The market value of each stock is equal to number of each stock outstanding multiplied by market price per share. Thus, the proceeds allocated to common stock equals the market value of equity divided by market value of the company multiplied by the lump sum.
Answer:
Adjusting Entry
Cost of goods sold (Dr.) $11,000
Beginning Inventory (Cr.) $6,000
Purchases (Cr.) $5,000
Closing Entry
Ending Inventory (Dr.) $2,000
Income Summary (Cr.) $2,000
Explanation:
The adjusting entry is made by debiting cost of goods sold account which reflects the amount of inventory sold during the month and the entry is credited by beginning inventory of $6,000 and the remaining amount which is $5,000 is credited in purchases account.
The closing entry is made by debiting the ending inventory by the amount of $2,000 and Income Summary account is credited by the same amount to close the inventory account.
Answer: $10,800
Explanation:
In the above scenario it is worthy of note that the company is the one that pays for Federal and State Unemployment tax.
That means that the employees pay for Federal income tax withheld at $4,000, Social security at 6% and Medicare at 1.5%.
Calculating salaries payable therefore would be,
= 16,000 - 4,000 - (16,000 * 6%) - (16,000 * 1.5%)
= $10,800
Salaries Payable would be recorded at $10,800.
Answer:
D. Qualified for the Position
Explanation:
Prima Facie Evidence
Prima Facie evidence is evidence that is sufficient to establish a fact or prove a proposition unless otherwise refutted.
Age Discriminationi in Employment Act
The age discrimination in Employment Act in the US was established as a labour law in 1967 and it was established to ensure that anyone who is at least 40 years of age does not suffer from employment discrimination.
The fact that Sharon is a forty-five year-old employee means she is qualified to file a suit against her employers under the Act. However, as previously stated before it can be established whether she deserves a higher pay or more dependable than her replacement or was discriminated against because of age, Sharon will need to establish the fact that she's qualified for the position taken away from her.
If she cannot prove that proposition or it ends up being refutted by the organisation, then the Age Discrimination in Employment Act cannot be invoked.
