Answer:
Businesses that do not maximise outputs from the given inputs are inefficient, and probably have diseconomies of scale, the opposite of economies of scale, that ocurrs when output increases proportionally less than the inputs that are invested.
This situation arises as a result of an economic law, the law of diminishing retuns. According to this economic law, there is a point in the production process in which the use of additional units of input do not result in a proportional yield, in other words, when a business presents diminishing returns, the more inputs it adds, the less output grows in proportion to the inputs.
Answer:
Cash flow from financing $34,100
Explanation:
The amount of financing cash flows that Smith would report in year 2021 is as follows:
Issuance of stock by Smith law firm $12,000
Loan from local bank $24,000
Dividends paid to stockholders ($1,900)
Cash flow from financing $34,100
Answer:
Option (a) is correct.
Explanation:
Alland can produce 32 units of food per person per year or 16 units of clothing per person per year:
Opportunity cost of producing a unit of food = (16 ÷ 32)
= 0.5 units of clothing
Opportunity cost of producing a unit of clothing = (32 ÷ 16)
= 2 units of food
Georgeland can produce 36 units of food per year or 18 units of clothing:
Opportunity cost of producing a unit of food = (18 ÷ 36)
= 0.5 units of clothing
Opportunity cost of producing a unit of clothing = (36 ÷ 18)
= 2 units of food
Therefore, the Georgeland has a absolute advantage in producing both the goods because it can produce more quantity of both the goods with the same resources as Alland. But the Georgeland has not having comparative advantage in producing either of the goods.
