Examples are the
following:
<span>1. </span>Tessie
is upset (line 243) and repeats that the drawing isn’t fair (lines 259-260).
<span>2. </span>The Hutchins’s
household’s papers are collected and put back into the box (lines 261-262)
<span>3. </span>Each
member of the household draws another slip (lines 271-287).
The tone of the fragment can be classified as straightforward because it is a direct message (option d).
<h3>What is the tone of a text?</h3>
The tone of a text is a concept that refers to the way in which the author wants to convey the message. Generally, the texts have different tones to add character to the text and motivate the reader to engage with the text.
<h3>What is the tone of the fragment?</h3>
To identify the tone of the fragment we must read it carefully, pay attention to the language it uses and identify if it has words that can give us clues of the tone.
Taking into account the above, it can be inferred that the tone of the fragment is straightforward due to the fact that the author does not use complex language. On the contrary, the language is simple, clear and literal so that the receiver and the reader understand the message.
Note: This question is incomplete because the options are missing. Here are the options:
- frustrated
- overjoyed
- proud
- straightforward
Learn more about tone in: brainly.com/question/23395598
#SPJ1
Madison’s version of the speech and press clauses, introduced in the House of Representatives on June 8, 1789, provided: “The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their sentiments; and the freedom of the press, as one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable.” The special committee rewrote the language to some extent, adding other provisions from Madison’s draft, to make it read: “ The freedom of speech and of the press, and the right of the people peaceably to assemble and consult for their common good, and to apply to the government for redress of grievances, shall not be infringed.” In this form it went to the Senate, which rewrote it to read: “That Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and consult for their common good, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” Subsequently, the religion clauses and these clauses were combined by the Senate. The final language was agreed upon in conference.
