I think for forty more days because but not sure
Answer:
The three States are:
1. Michigan
2. Ohio
3. New Hampshire
Explanation:
These States often receive the most expensive and targeted campaigns during elections since they are considered as 'Swing States'
Unlike 'Safe States' which are generally inclined towards one party, Swing States have a history of changing sides and voting for someone new in every election.
One year they might support a democratic candidate, while in another, they might side with the Republicans. Since it is extremely difficult to predict what they will do, and their decision plays a huge role in who wins the election, they are called 'swing States' and receive a lot of attention.
An unlimited government such as the human countries of North Korea, Cuba, Syria, Vietnam and China, is one where one person or a small group of people controls everything; it controls people's lives. The government's power has no limits.
Absolutism was a very common form of government in Europe between the 16th and 19th centuries and defended the theory of the king's absolute power over the entire nation. The power of kings during the <u>Middle Ages </u>was considered limited compared to the absolutist period, as there was a lot of political fragmentation and the king's influence depended on a relationship of vassalage, in which the exchange of favors between kings and nobles guaranteed real power.
As modern nations were being structured, mainly England, France and Spain, and as trade resurfaced in Europe, a new social class emerged with great economic power: the bourgeoisie. For the bourgeoisie, the political and economic fragmentation that existed since the Middle Ages was not interesting, as it affected their business, mainly because of the differences in currency and taxes existing from one province to another (even in provinces of the same kingdom, there were these differences in currency and taxes).
The nobility, in turn, welcomed the concentration of power in the figure of the monarch as a way to guarantee control of the lands he owned. Thus, the concentration of power in the hands of the king was a demand from the rising bourgeoisie and also from the nobility.
