1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
erma4kov [3.2K]
2 years ago
14

Question 5 (30 points)

History
1 answer:
sergejj [24]2 years ago
4 0

Between the late 1940s and the early 1990s, the Cold War era drastically changed Europe. The nations of Europe would have undoubtedly altered over that time, but without the consequences and influence of the Cold War, the changes would not have been as significant. Following the devastation of World War Two, the US provided billions of dollars in economic assistance that helped revive Western Europe under the Marshall plan. However, since countries who took Marshall assistance promised to share economic plans and utilize the cash to buy American goods, the USA's true goal was to solidify its dominance in Europe. Additionally, the rising popularity of communism in Western Europe was weakened by this increased riches. For instance, in France, the communist party had an estimated 1 million members by 1949.

But since the Soviet Union prevented countries in its zone of influence from accepting Marshall Plan help, the Marshall Plan exposed the first serious rift in Europe. Although they provided comparable assistance, it was insufficient, and Eastern Europe's economy started to deteriorate as a result. The two superpowers also designated their respective territories. Both Hungary and Czechoslovakia organized rallies and uprisings against communist government, and in each instance, the USSR ruthlessly suppressed them. It's conceivable that the UN would have adopted a more direct strategy, similar to what was seen in Korea, if the tension and threat of the cold war hadn't existed. However, in Europe, such an intervention was improbable.

Germany was split into the east (the GDR) and west (the FRG) for the duration of the Cold War, and some Germans still sense this division even now, over 40 years after reunification. The Cold War was such a huge and dramatic struggle that it is possible to argue that it influenced how the 21st century looks now. The impacts of it have not only been felt in Europe but also across the world over the past 20 years. Everything was impacted by the Cold War.

You might be interested in
Did the magna carta influence the american colonists’ ideas about government?
soldier1979 [14.2K]
Yes it did. This is clearly seen in the Bill of Rights. "N<span>o freeman ought to be taken, or imprisoned, or disseized of his freehold, liberties, or privileges, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any manner destroyed, or deprived of his life, liberty, or property, but by the judgment of his peers, or by the law of the land."  </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Social pros and cons of the transatlantic slave trade
Dmitry [639]

Some of the social pros and cons of the Transatlantic Slave trade include:

Social pros:

  • Intermingling of cultures.
  • Exposure of cultures to other cultures.

Social cons:

  • Unequal treatment of certain cultures.
  • Conflict

<h3>What were some social cons and pros of the slave trade?</h3>

The Transatlantic Slave trade led to Africans being able to interact with Europeans, Native Americans, and other African tribes they didn't know existed. This then led to an intermingling of cultures in what was one of the earliest forms of globalization.

The social cons outweighed the pros however as the intermingling led to the unequal treatment of cultures. For instance, Africans were looked down upon and their cultures were labeled as witchcraft. Conflict also arose between cultures due to the superiority complex.

Find out more on the cons of Transatlantic Slave trade at brainly.com/question/9374853

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
What happened when Japan made an ally with the US <br> (Hint ww2)<br> MARKING BRAINLIEST
Iteru [2.4K]
This is actually called the attack on the Pearl Harbor
Japan was pretty small at the time compared to The place they attacked yet they still attacked... why?...
Japan got mad because they didn’t get their end of whatever deal they were making. Also they had a large lack of supply for oil. So Japan decided to take out their anger by attacking the Pearl Harbor in Hawaii.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 4 of 10
Ksju [112]

Answer:

Railroads

Explanation:

Immigrants from China worked mostly as agriculture laborers on railroad construction.

3 0
4 years ago
B. J. is reading Wonder by R. J. Palacio, a story about a character with physical differences. To best understand what he is rea
lawyer [7]

Answer:

think of someone with a physical difference.

This will cause you to think and understand how that person feels, and better  understand this storiy's character.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The two major political parties in Canada are the
    7·1 answer
  • What do megaliths imply about the northern European civilizations that build them?
    8·1 answer
  • Please freaking help, I need these answer really badly
    11·2 answers
  • Which occurs during disequilibrium? Check all that apply.
    13·2 answers
  • Why have countries such as France and China instituted language controls?
    11·1 answer
  • Which allience had the greatest number of soldiers?
    14·1 answer
  • List at least four ways Ivan the Great (Ivan III) gained territory and power within Russia.
    15·1 answer
  • What sentence summarizes the ideas of Socrates?
    11·1 answer
  • Which statement is the best description of Martin Luther King Jr.’s central claim in the speech as a whole?
    7·1 answer
  • PLZ HURRY!!!! I'M TIMED ON THE TEST! I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST TO CORRECT ANSWER!
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!