1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alona [7]
3 years ago
13

Why did many Americans wish to remain neutral and not take sides in the growing conflicts in Europe

History
2 answers:
aleksandr82 [10.1K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The reason why the Americans wanted to remain neutral and not take sides in the growing conflicts in Europe is because we simply didn't want to get in war that isn't our fight neither want to send troops to Europe and fight over there and waist tax payers money instead use it and others ways. Its like two people arguing because usually people let the other two argue and dont interfere because they dont want to get caught up in it and its not their problem.

Explanation:

konstantin123 [22]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Explanation:

There were a few reasons, the president Wilson declarated a political of neutrality, the united states would not entangle itself with aliances with other nations. the EUA do not want alliance with Europe and stayed out of the war.

You might be interested in
The head of the Communist Chinese party was _____. Chiang Kai-shek Mao Zedong Chu Manchu
frutty [35]

Actually the answer is:

Chiang Kai-shek

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the objective of the 5th amendment
kykrilka [37]

The 5th Amendment is all about due process, self incrimination...


idk tbh i just learned this not so long ago but i hope this helped

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In England, the knights and burgesses met together, forming the basis for the House of Commons. How would other groups of people
pashok25 [27]

I believe the answer is: Originally meeting as a large group, as the House of Commons was instated, the clergy and nobles became the House of Lords

During the meeting, the members of the house of commons would be the one that analyze a certain legislation and determine whether the legislation is eligible for passing or not. The house of lords than would gather together to review the decision made by members of the house of commons.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What might have happened if Justinian had not survived the nika revolt?
meriva

The Byzantine emperor would have collapsed then a new monarch would have been put into place. Byzantium required a balance between church and state, the two headed eagle, so there would have had to be a new emperor, who might have a different control over the people for the better or worse.

  • <em><u>COPY PASTED EDITED</u></em>
4 0
3 years ago
This system is associated with the ideas of Adam Smith and capitalism.
Vikentia [17]
The correct answer for this question is B.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Panic of 1837:
    5·1 answer
  • ?How has international trade changed since the end of world war ii:
    9·1 answer
  • What country came into conflict with the zulu over territory?
    10·1 answer
  • Siberia is west of Croatia.<br> True or False
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following institutions were seen as particularly dangerous to the white order?
    15·1 answer
  • The Eastern Front is MOST associated with which of these?
    7·1 answer
  • ¿Cual fue el motivo de haber erigido o fundado Bonampak
    5·1 answer
  • What kind of factors pulled immigrants from Europe to America? Why did they come?​
    13·1 answer
  • In which region of asia would you find the godi desert
    12·2 answers
  • When will the next asteroid hit earth
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!