Answer:
adjective
Explanation:
it resembles without being identical
Answer:
By knowing the historical context of a novel or piece of literature one can deeply understand what exactly the author is trying to convey. For instance, in the short article "The Dark Secrets of this Now-Empty Island in Maine," which describes events that occurred in the 1910s that completely altered the history of Malaga Island. Without knowing many important historical aspects and the sense of society in this certain time period, one would not completely understand the truth behind this island. Malaga Island was, “a community of mixed races” which “drew the attention of those opposed to miscegenation, and Mainers with a bigoted view,” (Jester). African Americans in the 1910s were still not accepted in society and because of this many people believed that the residents on Malaga island “would interfere with tourist’s vision of the picturesque Maine ideal,” (Jester). The state decided that the people on Malaga Island were to be evicted, and exclaimed them to, “leave and remove your homes, or forcibly be removed and your homes will be burned,” (Jester). And so the people of Malaga Island did, “Many residents floated their homes up and down the river” and even “Some perished from this ordeal, with one mother who had fallen ill,” this brutal way of expelling these people from their homes, ripped families apart by killing one another by this harsh journey. As the eviction and many important events started to fade, “The state did its best to erase the past, but an ugly linguistic reminder kept bubbling up” (Jester). The word “Malago… was a way to talk about people of dark skin, or less than average intelligence,” (Jester). A simple word that may seem completely irrelevant to one who knows nothing about Malaga Island. But to one who knows the historical context of this empty and forgotten island, it is a great ordeal and brutal reminder of its inhumane past.
Explanation:
Here's what I put, hopefully it works for you guys!
And they yelled because they are performing both actions at once
Answer:
Speech about artificial boundaries can not divide the natural affinity among people.
Speech:
It is undeniably true that human bonds has no boundaries. A relationship between two individuals cannot be altered or severed by any human made territory. Though artificial boundaries may divide people into two or more territorial groups, the affinities among humans will always transcend such distinctions.
There is a unique characteristic in humanity that unities us in our diversity. There is a natural tendency within humans that makes us embrace each other regardless of territorial, racial or political differences.
It is an innate quality that each one of us has to unlock. Once we unlock this quality, we start to embrace one another and live in harmony with each other. Many a times human connections and bonds have proved to overcome territorial differences. In many instances, one can find that people living in border areas live with one another in harmony despite of political and territorial distinctions between them.
Therefore, the need to embrace one another is very important in order to prove that affinity among humans unite us ever in our diversity.
Explanation:
https://brainly.in/question/14238785
Hope this helps.
