1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]
2 years ago
6

Until the early 20th century, the major party's nominees for president were selected via which method?

History
1 answer:
damaskus [11]2 years ago
5 0

Until the early 20th century, the major party's nominees for president were selected via election by voters in direct primaries.

A direct election is a means of picking political officeholders wherein the citizens straightforwardly cast voting forms for the people or ideological group they want to see chosen.

The electoral college is occasionally viewed as a ceremonial body because it rarely acts in an unexpected or unpredictable way and the president of the U.S is selected in a direct way.

The strategy by which the victor or champs of an immediate political race are picked relies on the electing framework utilized. The most regularly utilized frameworks are the majority framework and the two-round framework for single-victor races, like an official political decision, and party-list relative portrayal for the appointment of a council.

The immediate political decision is a political decision in which individuals vote straightforwardly for their desired up-and-comer. In a circuitous political decision, a famous vote is the absolute number of votes got in the first-stage political decision, rather than the votes cast by those chosen.

To learn more about direct election refer to:

brainly.com/question/26258129

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Explain why a group taking a vote on something is an example of a direct democracy
KATRIN_1 [288]
Because democracy  main point is to have people vote on things 
6 0
3 years ago
the dawes act encouraged native americans to settle on land with their immediate families. why do you think this was important f
xenn [34]

Answer:

The Dawes Act was introduced in 1887 by the government that took away the lands belong to the Indian Tribes.

Explanation:

The Dawes Act introduced individual plots for the Native Indians and allowed them to become part of US citizens. The Act was Anglo-American hunger for Indian lands as it opened for sale to whites. It was the disastrous pieces of Indian law ever passed by Congress. Now the question arises, were the Native Americans happy about it?  The answer is, no they were not pleased with it. The treatment towards the Native American by the American has been hostile, which led many Indians to die in raids, wars, and diseases. According to the government, it was necessary to assimilate with the American (white) culture as it gave them US citizens. Allowing the individual in allotting land helped the government to regulate laws.

3 0
4 years ago
The Panama canal was built to shorten the distance between the Red Sea and the Bering Strait. true or false ?
OLEGan [10]
False
Hope this helps 

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In what way was the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas Nebraska Act similar?
GalinKa [24]

Answer:

The Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850 both had to do with states that wanted to enter the U.S. California entered the Union as a free state. The Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850 both created controversy when the tried to enter the Union.

Explanation:

The compromise also included a more stringent Fugitive Slave Law and banned the slave trade in Washington, D.C. The issue of slavery in the territories would be re-opened by the Kansas–Nebraska Act, but many historians argue that the Compromise of 1850 played a major role in postponing the American Civil War. What did Stephen Douglas try to accomplish with the Kansas-Nebraska act of 1854? ... (A) Douglass tried to build a railroad and promote western settlement. This was no more successful than the Compromise of 1850.

5 0
3 years ago
How did the Arab empire affect learning, culture,and the arts in Europe
zhuklara [117]
Alot of people in Europe were not educated because you had to have money to go to school and learn for example math the hard types so, the Europeans heard that there was people that were down south in the Arab region learning together the Europeans didn't even know where the number 0 came from they found out that it was first brought by the very intelligent scholars that were influenced by Isalm and the roots of the arab culure. 
hopefully that helps
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does child labor impact markets worldwide?
    5·1 answer
  • A pact between the president and the head of foreign country is called _____.
    8·2 answers
  • Which of these was a goal of the Marshall Plan during the Cold War?
    14·2 answers
  • How were the economic impacts of World War II similar in the United States<br> and the Soviet Union?
    10·1 answer
  • Describe two provisions of the Treaty of Versailles and explain how these provisions would lead to World War II.
    11·1 answer
  • What was the meaning of a multifront was for the United States during WWII
    7·1 answer
  • At age 22 Pele was considered a
    9·1 answer
  • How do the forested areas of Willapa hills differ from those in the Olympic mountains?
    5·1 answer
  • Which statements about Franklin Roosevelt's presidency are true
    7·1 answer
  • In addition to Jews, Roma, the disabled, political and religious dissenters, and homosexuals were targeted in the _______.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!