Answer:
it is not allocatively efficient
Explanation:
Monopoly is a market condition where one seller has all the market share. This leads to an inefficient market structure, an increase in the prices of goods and services and abnormal profits. A problem with adopting a fair return polity for a natural monopoly is that it is not allocatively efficient. In a monopoly, goods and services are not produced to help the economy or people.
<span>Because the federal reserve would want to discourage quick investments or want people to save more money right now. Long term rates would go down because these are well thought out infrastructure projects that are good for the long run.</span>
Answer:
3 workers
Explanation:
At optimal point, wage = Price * Marginal Product of Labour (MPL)
When 3 workers are employed,
Since wage is given = 25
And price = 4
When 3 workers are hired, wage is close to price * MPL because wage = 25 and p*MPL = 24
OR
salary paid = $25*3 = $75
Revenue generated = 24*$4= $96
This combination provides the best profit margin which is 96 - 75 = $21.
The proposed response of Adam Smith based on each scenario is given below:
<h3>Scenario 1</h3>
He would say that the pricing system should remain the main determinant of the market and the interference of the government was uncalled for.
<h3>Scenario 2</h3>
He would side with the free market system and be an opponent of the law that frowns on importation.
<h3>Scenario 3</h3>
He would support the suspension of the antitrust laws.
<h3>Scenario 4</h3>
He would believe that markets should not be regulated and the free market system should continue.
<h3>Who is Adam Smith?</h3>
He is the father of modern economics for his work in pioneering ideas such as free trade and the gross domestic product
Hence, we can see that the proposed response of Adam Smith based on each scenario is given above.
Read more about Adam Smith here:
brainly.com/question/50
#SPJ1