If you need to indicate the missing ammount of each letter in the grahp then it will be like follows:
For the first case:
A = $9,600 + $5,000 + $8,000 = $22,600$22,600 + $1,000 – B = $17,000
B = $22,600 + $1,000 – $17,000 = $6,600$17,000 + C = $20,000
C = $20,000 – $17,000 = $3,000
D = $20,000 – $3,400 = $16,600
<span>E = ($24,500 – $2,500) – $16,600 = $5,400
</span><span>F = $5,400 – $2,500 = $2,900
</span>And now for the second case:
G + $8,000 + $4,000 = $16,000
G = $16,000 – $8,000 – $4,000 = $4,000$16,000 + H – $3,000 = $22,000
H = $22,000 + $3,000 – $16,000 = $9,000(I – $1,400) – K = $7,000(I – $1,400) – $22,800 = $7,000
<span>I = $1,400 + $22,800 + $7,000 = $31,200
</span>J = $22,000 + $3,300 = $25,300
K = $25,300 – $2,500 = $22,800$7,000 – L = $5,000
<span>L = $2,000</span>
Answer: <em>$4. 71 hamburger and $6.29 French fries.
</em>
Explanation:
Total spendable income of Antonio = $11.00
1 hamburger = $1.50
1 order of French fries = $1.00
Utility maximization function: U(x1, x2) = x1x2 i.e. 1 hamburger and 2 orders of French fries
Using the Utility maximization function: U(x1, x2) = $1.50 + $2.00
= $3.50 per lunch
Therefore the customer will purchase hamburger worth of $(1.50 x 11.00/3.50) = $4. 71
And French fries orders worth of $(2.00 x 11.00/3.50) = $6.29
<em>Antonio will maximize his satisfaction by purchasing $4. 71 hamburger and $6.29 French fries.
</em>
A food surplus in a society can lead to many different things. But based on the principles of supply and demand a surplus of food should lead to a reduction in the price of food, because the quantity supplied is most likely higher than the quantity demanded. In addition a food surplus could lead a country or companies to sell their food surplus internationally or to "dump" the goods on another country or market by selling the goods for a very cheap price most likely lower than the price of the good in that market prior to the entry of this new producer or country with the food surplus.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question is option A) satisfy a requirement in addressing a risk .
Explanation:
The reason why management is implementing controls is to mitigate the risk in the newly developed system, that is why management should select that control which primarily mitigate the risk, which have been identified by the management. While designing a control, it would be necessary to consider all the aspects given in the question for a control to be best but in reality it might not be possible.
