Answer:
Multiple reimbursement scheme
Explanation:
What Donna Holbrook did is considered a case of multiple reimbursement. This means she requested the payment of the expense more than once. She first used the company credit card to buy the office supplies. This means that she didn’t use her own money because the credit card wasn’t hers. But a month after that, she used the receipt to request reimbursement from the company implying that she bought those supplies with her own money. By doing so, the company is paying twice for a purchase that was done only once. There’re also other kind of expense reimbursement schemes: <u>fictitious expense schemes</u> (when the expense is actually not real but made up by the employee); <u>overstated expense schemes</u> (when the employee inflates the expense in order to keep the extra money); and <u>mischaracterized expense schemes</u> (this occurs when the employee intends to get reimbursement for an expense that is personal and not related to the business).
Answer:
b.theory of comparative advantage
Explanation:
Comparative advantage theory uses the concept of opportunity cost to measure the efficiency of each firm in producing a good or service. If Company A has a higher opportunity cost than Company B in producing a service, it is best to let Company B perform this service, while A must specialize in another activity. This may apply to companies that have the option of producing components of their final product or outsourcing these components. If the opportunity cost of a third party firm is lower, that firm will be more efficient in producing that component. Then the company can use its time and resources for other activities and purchase the outsourced firm's component. This way, the firm will be allowing another company to do part of the business because that other company is more productive in that particular service.
Answer:
OK and..................................
I think the correct answer is true. <span>Knowing indicators of an unstable person can allow you to identify a potential insider threat before an incident. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>
If you're talking about branches, then it's the legislative branch.
