This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Although the leaders of two enemy nations admit to a buildup of their own military forces, each sees the other country's actions as unreasonable and motivated by evil intentions. This situation best illustrates:
the mere exposure effect.
the just-world phenomenon.
mirror-image perceptions.
deindividuation.
social facilitation.
None of the listed answers are correct
Answer:
This situation best illustrates mirror-image perceptions.
Explanation:
The term mirror-image perception refers to the human tendency of viewing others as the enemy, as evil, especially in a situation of conflict. It is called mirror-image because both people or sides involved in the conflict see themselves as good, and the other as the villain. That is precisely the case described in the passage. Both leaders do not see a problem concerning their own buildup of their military forces - they "know" they are doing it for good reasons. But both of them also think that the other leader doing it is a sign of evil intentions on his part.
Answer:
Marketing better, adverising, buying limited quantities
Explanation:
Answer:
The aspect of the psychodynamic theory that I think still has relevance today is metatheory.
The neo-Freudian theory that appeals to me is basic anxiety as theorized by Karen Horney. It appeals to me because the theory gave three options for someone suffering from basic anxiety which is moving towards others, moving against others, and moving away from others.
Explanation:
Psychodynamic theory is an approach to psychology that studies the forces that control experience and how they could affect a person's early life. This approach placed too much importance on psychological factors while ignoring biological influence on a person's mental health.
neo-Freudians believe in the work of Sigmund Freud but deviate from his focus on the effects of sex to emphasize on social environment and culture.
False because you use your hands in volleyball<span />
D. signed by the president.
Constitutional amendments need not be signed by the president to become valid. However, a constitutional amendment is one of the proposals that requires more time for preparation, preparation and voting, since it will modify the Federal Constitution. In summary, these are the steps to be taken in order for the bill to become a constitutional amendment:
Submission of a proposed amendment ;
Discussion and voting in the National Congress in two rounds, being considered approved when it obtains, in both, three fifths of the votes of the members of each one of the houses;
If approved, it will be promulgated by the bureaus of the House of Representatives and the Federal Senate;
If the proposal is rejected, it will be closed and the substance contained in it can not be subject to a new amendment in the same legislative session.
