1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Masja [62]
2 years ago
9

The statistics below compare the average annual income of Americans in 1950.

History
1 answer:
pav-90 [236]2 years ago
3 0

The United States Congress adopted termination as its new approach to dealing with American Indians in 1953.

This program terminated the protected trust status of all Indian-owned lands and significantly reduced government assistance for Indian tribes. The BIA launched an urban relocation program that was optional in reaction to this policy.

Thus, Option C is correct.

<h3>What reason did the US begin transferring Americans?</h3>

The intention was to relocate Native Americans to urban areas where they would eventually vanish after assimilating into the majority-white population of the United States.

As a result, the government would open up tribal land for development and taxation.

For more information about the Relocation program refer to the link:

brainly.com/question/12072272

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
The New Deal was a great success. It provided relief for tons of people during a really bad time. Moreover, the legacy of the Ne
zlopas [31]

Answer:

B D E is your answer

Explanation:

Although it was already on your screen. I don't mind though.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Catholics migrated to Maryland colony in the 17th century primarily to?
Ad libitum [116K]

The Catholic Experiment. ... The Southern Colonies ... than the 1600s, Catholics were still a persecuted minority in the seventeenth century. ... Consequently, most immigrants did not cross the Atlantic in family units but as individuals.


6 0
3 years ago
Can you guess how the world would be with Anarchy ?
oksian1 [2.3K]
It depends. The true definition, with is roughly law without force, then it wouldn't be too bad. Sounds like it would just be a non corrupt world. However, modern day groups like ANTIFA, it would suck. Things have been blown out of proportion honestly to the point where anarchy, or "anti-fascism", almost looks like fascism.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Identify the form/s of government of<br> china.
nikitadnepr [17]

Answer:

hope it helps

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What was the effect of Roosevelt changing "world history" to "infamy" in his appeal to the American people?
BartSMP [9]
Because world history fits the definition of infamous therefore he did what he did!
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In 1944, journalist Ernie Pyle wrote, it seems to me a miracle that we ever took the beach at all. What can you infer about d-da
    8·1 answer
  • The fall on Constantinople led to the breakup of
    5·1 answer
  • 50 points!!!
    9·2 answers
  • What are two judicial powers that governors have
    7·1 answer
  • The president has the power to appoint which of the following positions?
    9·1 answer
  • What was the embargo act? In your own words!!
    7·1 answer
  • What is the Great Fear?
    11·1 answer
  • How did Kennedy show his support for African American equality? Check all of the boxes that apply.
    5·1 answer
  • Why was the removal of the Nez Percés particularly harsh?
    6·1 answer
  • What was prohibition?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!