Answer:
Compliance. Obviously this is one of the main reasons to conduct an audit: to meet the statutory requirements and regulations in your industry. ...
Explanation:
Answer

<em>According to Hub Pages,</em>
- Simplification. A cartoonist simplifies the subject matter while maintaining the viewer’s ability to recognize it. Eyes become circles or dots, mouths are reduced to curved lines, and noses or feet are triangles. It is a tribute to the artist’s skill that so much content can be wrung from these simple geometric forms. We see joy, pain, and fear through the subtle manipulation of lines depicting eyebrows, smiles, or frowns. It is a fabulous accomplishment in its own way.
- Emphasis. Emphasis involves making certain aspects of a cartoon stand out from other details. It might involve drawing facial characteristics that are larger than they should be, or portrayed with more detail than the rest of the figure or scene. It might mean adding shadow or color. It could also be determined by placing a specific detail in a prominent location on the page.
- Exaggeration. This technique is especially important to develop when learning cartooning. Let’s switch from the comics page to the editorial section of our newspaper, and we’ll observe that public figures are made recognizable by the exaggeration of specific physical characteristics. Barack Obama is drawn with dark eyes, big ears, and an elongated chin. George W. Bush was depicted with huge ears that stuck out. Bill Clinton, a large nose and square chin. My personal favorite presidential caricature was Richard Nixon’s, epitomized by sagging, jowly cheeks, a long nose and receding hairline.
- Repetition. Go back to your daily newspaper and glance at the comics’ page. What does each character have in common? They almost never change clothes! They are seen day after day wearing the same shirt, dress, or suit. They never wear anything different! The cartoonist is using repetition to identify the character. Political cartoons are similar. If a cartoonist is satirizing the President or another political figure, they would not arbitrarily put him in jogging clothes or swimming trunks, for example, because we are not accustomed to seeing him in casual clothing or sports attire. We see the President in a suit every day. Consequently, cartoonists will place him in a suit to allow for easier identification. Remember discussing Charlie Brown’s distinctively patterned shirt? It is through repetition that we know this shirt is his.

<em>Big thanks to Hub Pages, that's where I got all the answers! <3</em>

<em>Hope this helps! <3</em>

Full question:
Amy walked into her office cubicle and sat down. The entire episode with the blond man had taken well over two hours of her day. Plus, the police officers had told her the district attorney would also want to speak with her, which meant she would have to spend even more time dealing with this incident. She hoped her manager would understand.
Based on this case study, what security awareness measures, training documents, and posters had an impact on this event?
2. Do you think that Amy should have done anything differently? What would you have done in her situation? Ethic Decision Making Suppose that the blond man in the scenario was someone Amy knew socially. Suppose she also knew he had no relationship to the company and no business being in the building. If Amy chose not to make a report about the event, would she be violating her ethical position?
Answer and Explanation:
The security awareness documents and posters did not have any impact here as the Amy did not pay much attention to security measures.
Amy should have let her manager know all the details so that appropriate measures are taken to take care of security issues
she would be violating her ethical standards or position as security could be breached and it would be as a result of her lack of thoroughness and honesty
Article VI (6), Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is also known as the Supremacy Clause. It says that U.S federal constitution is more important over state laws. So if there are any conflictions between the Constitution and the states, we would use the D- Supremacy Clause to determine the outcome.
I hope this helps! :)