1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kolbaska11 [484]
2 years ago
8

Compare the Parliamentary and Presidential forms of Government with reference to India and the U.S.A.​

History
1 answer:
Ksivusya [100]2 years ago
6 0

The presidential system selects a head of government independently of the legislature, while in contrast, the head of government in a parliamentary system answers directly to the legislature. Presidential systems necessarily operate under the regulations of separation of powers, while parliamentary methods do not.

<h3>What is the presidential state of government give an example?</h3>

A presidential system is a method of government where a head of government is also head of state and shows an executive branch that is different from the legislative branch. The United States, for instance, has a presidential system.

<h3>What is the difference of parliamentary and presidential?</h3>

In a parliamentary form of government, the powers are divided between the little head and the real head of the state. In a presidential form of government on the other hand the forces are concentrated in the hands of the single executive or the President of the nation.

To learn more about presidential system, refer

brainly.com/question/15453662

#SPJ9

You might be interested in
What is Virginia had not seceded from the Union? Would this have affected the war? Why or Why not?
Ne4ueva [31]
Yes it would have because if Virginia had rejected secession, the prospect of Lee in command of Union forces rather than Confederate forces would have presented major problems for the Confederacy. The South would have lost a major economic and political asset, the state of West Virginia would never have been created, the war would almost certainly have been shorter. Interestingly, such circumstances might cast some doubts on how determined the North would have been to end slavery permanently.
Hope this helped!!
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where did they find
Lemur [1.5K]
I literally can’t understand you rewrite the question
7 0
3 years ago
Which explains the large number of people who left England and came to America in the 1600s?
Vlad1618 [11]
B. The English government forced them to leave.  
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Did the british go to war with the us in ww2
tresset_1 [31]
No. They fought alongside each other.
3 0
3 years ago
. Hinduism and Islam are two of the world's most widely practiced religions. Followers of these religions interacted a great dea
fenix001 [56]
Yes i dont neither can you translate it in your own words please?
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is an enumerated power in the Constitution?
    8·2 answers
  • How can you justify your answer
    10·1 answer
  • Wich country would have the best mafia<br> 1.)Italy<br> 2.)Japan<br> 3.)Mexico
    6·1 answer
  • For each statement, identify whether it was a cause or effect of theFor each statement, identify whether it was a cause or effec
    13·2 answers
  • What made many people in rhode island colony rich
    10·1 answer
  • Why did early humans, no longer have to move?
    13·2 answers
  • True or false for both questions please
    14·2 answers
  • Who believed government should be administered by a group of the best men?
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following is the best example of human adaptation?<br> O<br> A<br> Mining for col
    11·1 answer
  • At the end of World War I, Woodrow Wilson proposed an organization to help nations get together to talk and sort things out.
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!