The Supreme Court's Miranda ruling permits unexpected questioning to be used as direct evidence in court in cases involving public safety.
What is a Supreme court?
The nation's highest court is the Supreme Court. The judgment rendered by the Supreme Court is the last word. The federal court is lower than the Supreme Court. The supreme court is to analyze past results of the court and pass judgment on the result.
According to the Miranda rule, the supreme court has allowed the police the right to warrantless interrogation and search of cell phones, homes, offices, and other personal places. The Fifth and Sixth Amendments are to be used as evidence in court as public safety.
As a result, the Miranda rule the supreme court has allowed to the unwarned interrogation.
Learn more about on the Supreme Court, here:
brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ4
Answer:
The recording of physical actions or movements of participants is called <u>Nonverbal</u> observation .
Explanation:
Nonverbal Observation -
This is type of non linguistic transmission of any kind of information , via any auditory , visual , tactile and physical channels.
Nonverbal communication refers to the transmission of any kind of signal or message via any non verbal platform ,
Non verbal platform could be by facial expression , eye contact , any gestures , posture or the distance between two peoples .
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
Hey there!
Your correct answer is:
B. to help insulate homes from harsh, cold conditions.
Hope this helps!
Have a great day (:
