Writing about nineteenth-century women's travel writing, Lila Harper notes that the four women she discussed used their own names, in contrast with the nineteenth-century female novelists who either published anonymously or used male pseudonyms. The novelists doubtless realized that they were breaking boundaries, whereas three of the four daring, solitary travelers espoused traditional values, eschewing radicalism and women's movements. Whereas the female novelists criticized their society, the female travelers seemed content to leave society as it was while accomplishing their own liberation. In other words, they lived a contradiction. For the subjects of Harper's study, solitude in both the private and public spheres prevailed—a solitude that conferred authority, hitherto a male prerogative, but that also precluded any collective action or female solidarity.
Answer:
E. While traveling alone in the nineteenth-century was considered a radical act for a woman, the nineteenth-century solitary female travelers generally held conventional views.
Explanation:
What best characterizes the "contradiction" that the author refers to is "While traveling alone in the nineteenth-century was considered a radical act for a woman, the nineteenth-century solitary female travelers generally held conventional views."
This is evident in the passage where it was written that "Whereas the female novelists criticized their society, the female travelers seemed content to leave society as it was while accomplishing their own liberation."
Answer:By threatening a veto, the President can persuade legislators to alter the content of the bill to be more acceptable to the President. Congress can override a veto by passing the act by a two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate. (Usually an act is passed with a simple majority.)
Explanation:
The tensions between the French speaking,Catholic descendants of French colonists and the English speaking,Protestant British population and government.
Ideas that the USA was planning any invasion of Canada in 1865 or just after are nonsense - Britain had sold far more war materiel to the Union than the Confederacy during the Civil War,the Union army was needed to enforce Reconstruction on US citizens in the South,and any war with Britain would have seen the huge British navy establish a blockade of the US coast and cripple the US economy - as it had done in the War of !812.President Johnson was aware of all of this,so had no intention - or desire to - attack Canada.
Answer:
<h3>Elimination of social inequality was an important legacy of the Social Gospel Movement.</h3>
Explanation:
The Social Gospel Movement took place between 1870 to 1920. It was a religious social reformation movement that attempted to bring social equality through Christian ethics.
In the late 19th century, the Protestants could no longer tolerate the existing poverty and the low quality of life.The Social Gospel Movement, therefore, provided a platform for action to address these problems.It became prominent during the early 20th century.
The movement aimed to eradicate social problems such as inequality, poverty, crime, alcoholism, racial atrocity, etc. The members of the movement also sought to use Christian prayers to eliminate social evils. They believed that enhancing the lives of the people would ultimately improve the quality of their moral lives.
