The total number of africans forcibly brought to all of the americas as slaves is estimated to have been as many as?

i need help ASAP!!!! Generally, parties of 8 or more require many restaurants to include gratuity of 18% on the check before pre

igor_vitrenko [27]

Answer:

b)$34.45

Explanation:

Gratuity is similar to a service charge.

If the bill is $191.40, and gratitude of 18 percent will be added.

The actual gratitude amount that will be added will be equal to

18% of the $191.40 bill.

=18/100 x $191.40

=0.18 x 191.40

= $34.45

4 0

3 years ago

Liu Company has sales of $48,500,000, and the break-even point in sales dollars is $31,040,000. Determine the company's margin o

slava [35]

Answer:

Margin of safety ratio= 0.36= 36%

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Liu Company has sales of $48,500,000, and the break-even point in sales dollars is $31,040,000.

To calculate the margin of safety as a percentage, we need to use the following formula:

Margin of safety ratio= (current sales level - break-even point)/current sales level

Margin of safety ratio= (48,500,000 - 31,040,000) / 48,500,000

Margin of safety ratio= 0.36= 36%

5 0

4 years ago

The leader's decision choices in the vroom-jago leader – participation model are authority, consultative and __________.

ohaa [14]

<span>The leader's decision choices in the vroom-jago leader – participation model are authority, consultative and groups.

This leadership model is about how a leader should make a decision by themselves or using a group to consult. They are very rational leaders and are trying to make the best overall decision for the team.
</span>

5 0

3 years ago

The tragedy of the commons occurs because

kow [346]

<span>c. common resources are rival in consumption. In the tragedy of the commons, William Forster Lloyd presented the example of a common resource being over used and destroyed because for any individual abusing the resource, they gained a benefit while the damage to the resource was paid by everyone. So let's look at the available options and see what makes sense, or doesn't make sense. a. people consider the value of resources in the future more than in the present. * If this were true, the there wouldn't be a tragedy of the commons. So this is an incorrect answer. b. markets do not account for the presence of property rights. * The tragedy of the commons doesn't involve property rights. EVERYONE in the community is allowed to use the commons. The problem is irresponsible overuse of the common resource. So this is also an incorrect answer. c. common resources are rival in consumption. * This is the correct answer. The concept of Rivalry is where a common resource can not be simultaneous consumed by multiple users, or if the consumption of a resource decreases its utility to another consumer. In the tragedy, if one person grazes (consumes) more than their fair share, the commons gets over grazed and over time stops producing. Each person who's overgrazing does get a tangible short term benefit for doing so, but everyone has to pay the cost. d. government does not efficiently allocate society's scarce resources. * This is also a wrong answer. It's true that the commons could be regulated by the government, but then it would no longer be the commons.</span>

8 0

3 years ago

In a certain jurisdiction caroline, who is earning $42,200, currently pays a flat percentage of 25% income tax. The tax authorit

NISA [10]

The amount of tax paid less by Caroline as per the new taxation policies will be $950 over her annual salary of $42,200 after the taxes are applied assuming deductions being made.

The calculation of tax saved by Caroline will be done on the basis of comparing the taxation rates of both the policies after taking the changes into account.

<h3>Calculation of tax savings</h3>

The formula for calculation of tax will be done as follows when the taxes are charged on flat basis under the old policy,

$\rm Income\ Tax= Salary\ x\ Rate\ of\ Taxation\\\\\rm Income\ Tax= 42200\ x\ {\dfrac{25}{100}\\\\\\\\\\\\\\rm Income\ Tax= \$10550$

The taxation for the first $20000 as per the new policy will be

$\rm Income\ Tax\ Threshold= 20000\ x\ \dfrac{15}{100}\\\\\rm Income\ Tax= \$3000$

Calculating further taxation,

$\rm Income\ Tax= 22200\ x\ \dfrac{30}{100}\\\\\rm Income\ Tax= \$6600$

So, total taxation as per the new policy will be $9600. Now comparing the taxation of old scheme with new scheme, we get,

$\rm Income\ Tax\ Savings= Old\ Taxation - New\ Taxation\\\\\rm Income\ Tax\ Savings=10550-9600\\\\\rm Income\ Tax\ Savings=950$

So, the total taxes saved are $950 when the taxation rate changes.

Hence, the correct statement is that tax savings of $950 is possible when the authorities change the taxation rates to such slab rates by Caroline.

Learn more about tax savings here:

brainly.com/question/2396701

6 0

3 years ago