Answer:
The correct answer to this question is A) because resources are not equally good in each production activity.
Explanation:
PPS or Production possibility frontier ( which is often as production possibility curve ) shows the possible combinations( of two products or services) with maximum outputs that can be produced in an economy when all the available resources are fully and efficiently used.
The reason why opportunity cost is increased while moving along PPS is because when we increase the output of one good , that means we are allocating more resources towards this good ,that means we will be left with the fewer resources to carry out the production of other good , so therefore the opportunity cost would increase.
It’s definitely not A in my opinion, i believe it is b
Answer: Not Sound as Company does not benefit as a Whole.
Explanation:
This question alludes to the presence of Divisions in a company tasked with producing different segments of a good.
One Division makes a segment of the good and transfers it for a price to the other division so that they may be able to show Revenue on their books.
The reasoning of the CEO of Lexington is flawed because if she chooses the highest feasible Transfer Fee for the goods it will be good for the Division doing the Transferring because they make more revenue.
However, it will increase the cost of those being transferred to by the same amount that it increase the revenue of the Division transferred from.
As a result, the increase in Cost and the Increase in Revenue in the two divisions will cancel each other out meaning that the company did not benefit.
Answer:
$677,000,000
Explanation:
The computation of pension expenses is shown below:-
Pension expenses = Service cost + Interest on PBO - Return on plan assets + Amortization of prior service cost - Amortization of net loss
= $366,000,000 + $737,000,000 - $593,000,000 + $13,000,000 - $154,000,000
= $677,000,000
Therefore for computing the pension expenses we simply applied the above formula so that the correct amount could come
Answer:
D) a government employee illegally discriminating against another during performance of his or her official duties.
Explanation:
The term, under the colour of state law is used to show the situation whereby an individual claims that his or her actions are legitimized as a result of his role as a governmental agent. This is done when those actions are illegal. For example, denying a person a car lincense just because, the person happens to be of different skin colour.
