Answer:
The kingdoms united for protection against attacking invaders.
Answer:Yes, practical knowledge does improve behaviour
Explanation: Awareness is a precursor to further development which informs improved behaviour. Practical knowledge broaden ones level of reasoning thus, having a positive effect on behavioural pattern. Learning with understanding is facilitated when new and existing practical knowledge is structured around the major concepts. Learning is facilitated through the use of metacognitive strategies that identify, monitor, and regulate cognitive processes. All of this is a product of practical knowledge which gradually improves our behaviour.
Answer:
see below *ALSO SPELL CHECK PLEASE GRAMMERLY ISNT WORKING FOR SOME REASON*
Explanation:
In the persepctive of the German people, the post-war punishment that would be percieved as the "harshest" or "most upsetting" was most likely punishment 1,4 and 5, and the ones that were probably viewed as the "east harsh" or insignificant to the German people was punishment 8. The reason that I assume that the harshest, most significant, and most upsetting punishment(s) were 1,4, and 5 is because these are the punishments that effected the german people <em>directly. </em>The loss of land probably led to relocation and people losing homes, property, etc. The fact that Germany has to take the blame for the war led to racism and prosecution of the German people, many of which had nothing to do with the war and wanted it to end as much as everyone else. And, lastly, punishment 5 was one of the most upsetting because the debt that Germany went into (-33 billion dollars!) will no doubt have caused inflammation of prices, poverty, and lack of resources due to low government funding, which would have effected the people the most, especially those who depended on government help and were not doing well financially to begin with. The punishment that was probably the least significant to the German people was 8, "force all military leaders, including Kaiser Wilhelm II to face trials for war crimes". This is because the people did not have a direct relation with any of these leaders, so it does not concern them as much as punishments like 1,4 and 5 did.
Answer:
I think this would be defined as discrimination
The answer is: <span>the assumptions we make about the world.
This principle could be translated into two different people that give two opposite response in handling a same problem. (one succesful and one catastrophic)
One people could be influenced by optimism that make him/her believe tha the problems is not going the hurt them, while the other could be influenced by negative outlook that become self-fulfilling phropecy of his/her failure)</span>