True or false: all members of the clade thyreophora were quadrupedal (walked on 4 legs).

Social Studies

1 answer:

svp [43]2 years ago

6 0

All members of the clade thyreophoran were quadrupedal (walked on 4 legs).

The statement is True.

An order of armoured ornithischian dinosaurs known as Thyreophoran existed from the Early Jurassic through the end of the Cretaceous period. The body armour arranged in rows along the body is a distinguishing feature of thyreophoran.

The well-known Stegosauria, or plated dinosaurs, and Ankylosauria, or armoured dinosaurs, as well as their more primitive members, such Scutellosaurus and Scelidosaurus, make up the majority of the Thyreophora.

The majority of ankylosaurs, including Euoplocephalus, Nodosaurus, and Palaeoscincus, walked close to the ground on short, stocky legs in a quadrupedal (4) stance and had relatively low and wide body shapes. The length of the rear legs was greater than the length of the front legs, like in stegosaurs, although not to the same degree as in Stegosaurus.

To learn more about Thyreophora, refer

brainly.com/question/28169174

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

What was the main reason the

timurjin [86]

Answer:

The kingdoms united for protection against attacking invaders.

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Does practical knowledge improve behavior?

ValentinkaMS [17]

Answer:Yes, practical knowledge does improve behaviour

Explanation: Awareness is a precursor to further development which informs improved behaviour. Practical knowledge broaden ones level of reasoning thus, having a positive effect on behavioural pattern. Learning with understanding is facilitated when new and existing practical knowledge is structured around the major concepts. Learning is facilitated through the use of metacognitive strategies that identify, monitor, and regulate cognitive processes. All of this is a product of practical knowledge which gradually improves our behaviour.

7 0

3 years ago

Some of the major punishments for Germany were 1) Loss of 10% of total land 2) Loss of all overseas colonies 3) Demilitarization

Free_Kalibri [48]

Answer:

see below *ALSO SPELL CHECK PLEASE GRAMMERLY ISNT WORKING FOR SOME REASON*

Explanation:

In the persepctive of the German people, the post-war punishment that would be percieved as the "harshest" or "most upsetting" was most likely punishment 1,4 and 5, and the ones that were probably viewed as the "east harsh" or insignificant to the German people was punishment 8. The reason that I assume that the harshest, most significant, and most upsetting punishment(s) were 1,4, and 5 is because these are the punishments that effected the german people <em>directly. </em>The loss of land probably led to relocation and people losing homes, property, etc. The fact that Germany has to take the blame for the war led to racism and prosecution of the German people, many of which had nothing to do with the war and wanted it to end as much as everyone else. And, lastly, punishment 5 was one of the most upsetting because the debt that Germany went into (-33 billion dollars!) will no doubt have caused inflammation of prices, poverty, and lack of resources due to low government funding, which would have effected the people the most, especially those who depended on government help and were not doing well financially to begin with. The punishment that was probably the least significant to the German people was 8, "force all military leaders, including Kaiser Wilhelm II to face trials for war crimes". This is because the people did not have a direct relation with any of these leaders, so it does not concern them as much as punishments like 1,4 and 5 did.

5 0

2 years ago

The practice by some lenders to refuse to lend in certain areas because of race, color, national origin, or religion, regardless

Darya [45]

Answer:

I think this would be defined as discrimination

3 0

3 years ago

The ames room, in which people are seen to get small or enlarge as they move about, demonstrates that our perception of the worl

Arada [10]

The answer is: <span>the assumptions we make about the world.
This principle could be translated into two different people that give two opposite response in handling a same problem. (one succesful and one catastrophic)
One people could be influenced by optimism that make him/her believe tha the problems is not going the hurt them, while the other could be influenced by negative outlook that become self-fulfilling phropecy of his/her failure)</span>

3 0

3 years ago