Quiet Revolution, separatists, FLQ, government, cells, code, captured, arrest, October 5, James Cross, $500,000, Passage, October 10, Labour, Parliament, War Measures Act, Peace.
<span>Executive Order 9066 clearly contradicts Theodore Roosevelt's statements about race, creed, color, or national origin. Because of the Executive Order 9066, Japanese Americans were relocated to Internment Camps through the War Relocation Authority. It was because Americans were fearful that Japanese Americans were still loyal to Japan during World War II and many Americans feared that they could be spies for the Japanese Empire. By placing them into Internment Camps we were able to keep tabs on them. During the 1980s, the government actually paid reparations to Japanese people that were still alive from the Internment Camps.</span>
Answer:
pretty sure its a sorry if im wrong but idrk
Explanation:
Answer:
Aristotle Peter III is the man whose writings were influenced.
Explanation:
Fredrick was remembered as being the best father of the militarism during the Prussian militarism. However, the location of Prussia was near the borderland. There were vast empires that had to go for the war on frequent occasions. But this did not prevent Fredrick from unifying the nation. He yielded a highly-trained army who offered public education to other citizens
His admired had high ambitions on the continent, and it is through his efforts that Napoleon made efforts and visited him in his tomb after he had defeated Prussia.
Answer:
In Katz v. USA (1967), the most important Fourth Amendment case, the defendant was sentenced by a federal court for illegal gambling. He organized them using a long-distance telephone, which was the crime against federal law. The judge admitted evidence to the trial in the form of telephone recordings of the accused received by the FBI agents. They installed eavesdropping equipment outside the telephone booth with which the accused called while committing a crime. The Supreme Court rejected the conviction.
Despite the fact that in the Katz case, the Court emphasized the protection of a person’s private life, rather than premises, it made one reservation: “The Fourth Amendment should not be construed as a basis for the adoption of a common “right to privacy.”
The decision in the Katz case is of great importance also for another reason. Judge Harlan, who joined the majority opinion, defined the criteria subsequently used by the courts to establish a violation or non-violation of the Fourth Amendment as a result of specific actions by the authorities. This criterion is called “reasonable expectation of privacy.” The criterion is based on two premises: first, a person must show a valid (subjective) expectation of respect for the right to privacy; secondly, this expectation must be of such a kind that society can recognize it as "reasonable."
Explanation:
