Is this a true or false question? Is it multiple choice? is it expected to be written in complete sentences as a short answer? I need more context on how to respond to the situation in the question :)
Answer:
a) if the terms of trade are 4 chips for 1 pretzel, would trade be advantageous for Luxland? explain.
Yes, it is advantageous for Luxland. On its own, Luxland can only produce 1 chip for 1 pretzel, but with trade, 1 pretzel would now be equivalent to 4 chips, representing a net gain of 3 chips.
b) if the terms of trade are 4 chips for 1 pretzel, would trade be advantageous for Leanderland? explain.
No, trade would not be advantageous. We can see than domestically, Leanderland can produce 2 pretzels for every chip, because the graph shows that 4 chips are equivalent to 8 pretzels for this nation.
For trade to be advantageous, Leanderland should obtain at least 9 pretzels for the 4 chips.
Answer: C it forces the writer to be specific early in the process
Explanation:
just did it
Explanation:
think the answer is E all of the Above
<span>If
the friend sues Mary, the court most likely will not require Mary to do
anything because this was a gift promise. In order for a gift promise to be
enforceable by the law, it should be a contract. And in order for it to be a
contract, there should be a consideration received by Mary but in this case, no
consideration was received by Mary therefore, the promise is unenforceable.</span>
