1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
garri49 [273]
2 years ago
15

In which way did the amendment process for the constitution differ from that of the articles of confederation?

History
1 answer:
uysha [10]2 years ago
5 0

Constitutional amendments required a three-quarters state majority, while amendments to the Articles of Confederation required a unanimous state vote.

A constitution is a set of basic principles or established precedents that form the legal basis of a political body, organization, or another type of body and generally determine how that body is governed.

When these principles are set down in a single document or set of legal documents, we say that these documents embody a written composition. When brought together in a single comprehensive document, it embodies a codified constitution. The British Constitution is a striking example of an unwritten constitution. Instead, much of the underlying law of legislatures, judicial proceedings, or treaties are written.

The legislation affects different levels of organizations, from sovereign states to corporations to unincorporated bodies. The treaty that establishes an international organization is also its constitution, as it defines how that organization is structured. Within a state, the constitution defines the underlying principles of the state, the process by which laws are made, and by whom. Some constitutions, especially codified ones, also act as limiters of state power, setting limits, such as fundamental rights, that the rulers of the state cannot violate.

Learn more about the constitution here: brainly.com/question/453546

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
During the effort to desegregate schools in Little Rock, why did Eisenhower place the Arkansas national guard under army command
Fed [463]
D because the president at the time was against racism but the southern governor of Arkansas was for it.
7 0
3 years ago
Approximately how many foreign-born people are living in the U.S. today?
algol13
43.3 Million Foreign-born
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compare and contrast the changes in the government, economy, and society from the Romanov era under the tsar to the rule by the
Tresset [83]

The rulers of the Soviet Union viewed empire and imperialism in ideological terms as ‘the highest and final stage of capitalism’.1 By this Leninist definition, the Soviet Union did not identify itself as an empire, and instead, its leaders vehemently denounced imperialism that was carried out by its enemies and competitors: the capitalist states. Despite its own anguish over being identified as an empire, the Soviet Union indeed was one. While the meaning of ‘empire’ has shifted over time, for the purposes of this paper the definition of empire is in the sense of a great power, a polity, ruling over vast territories and people, leaving a significant impact on the history of world civilizations.2 As the characteristics of the Soviet Union are examined, support for viewing the USSR as an empire grows.

The Soviet Union emerged after the Russian Revolution of 1917. The Tsarist Russian Empire’s government was overthrown by the local soviets, led by the Bolsheviks. The Bolsheviks attempted to replace the Russian empire with a communist one, in which socialism would make nationalismobsolete and in place there would be a supra-national imperial ideology.3 Still, coming back to the issue of ‘empire’, the Soviet Union clearly maintained a commanding control over multi-ethnic and multi-linguistic societies that surpassed the extent of the preceding Imperial Russia Empire. A question thus arises: was the USSR a Russian empire? The first aspect to consider is if the USSR was a continuation of Russian imperialist power or if an intrinsic distinction can be made between the two. What is notable to address is what is meant by ‘Russian’ identity and nationality, its formation, and reshaping through time. Once this will be accounted for, this paper will move on with an answer to the question: the USSR was indeed an essentially different empire from the one preceding it, and thus, the USSR was not a Russian empire.


8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List one similarity between present day north carolina and colonial north carolina
trapecia [35]

the geography is still the same

4 0
3 years ago
What did the Anti-Federalisis want
Ber [7]

Answer:

Many Anti-Federalists preferred a weak central government because they equated a strong government with British tyranny. Others wanted to encourage democracy and feared a strong government that would be dominated by the wealthy. They felt that the states were giving up too much power to the new federal government.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these factors led to the stock market crash of 1929?
    5·2 answers
  • Early Christianity is described as being a sect of Judaism. What is a sect?
    10·2 answers
  • How many people die in car accidents every year united states?
    10·1 answer
  • Why are people trying to impeach president trump?...
    7·2 answers
  • How did baron de montesquieu and john locke influence the founding fathers
    11·1 answer
  • Explain why Egypt was a source of Anglo-French rivalry.
    9·1 answer
  • 48.
    15·1 answer
  • Name at least six WWll military Generals who were against the use of the atomic bomb
    15·1 answer
  • According to Bhargava, why is “inventing stuff” better than donating large sums of money to non-profit organizations
    13·1 answer
  • Which actions by Truman demonstrated that his policies were harsher than Roosevelt's?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!