Answer:
$628.49
Explanation:
Cash flows Discount factor Future value
$100 1.1449 $114.49
$200 1.07 $214
$300 1 $300
Future value $628.49
The discount factor is as follows
= (1 + interest rate)^number of years
For $100 the year is 2
For $200 the year is 1
For $300 the year is 0
Answer:
Option D Showing the absence of privity of contract between it and the consumer.
Explanation:
The reason is that privity of contract says that the party of the contract are only allowable to sue each other which in other words can enforce the other to fulfill his requirements that were agreed while forming contract. So the right answer is option D because it is not related to the negligence claim.
The duty of care that the company owes towards its product's users includes using appropriate production process so that the customer will not be injured, placing the caution and warning labels so that the person can save him from the injury and the company has used components that will not harm the user of the product.
So all the options are correct except option D.
When the total expenses are greater than the total revenues, then the income summary account has a debit balance.
An income summary account is a temporary account in which the revenue and expenses closing entries are entered to find out the profit or loss.
In the income summary account, all the revenue account closing entries are credited, and all the expenses closing entries are on the debit side.
Thus, if the credit balance is more than the debit balance, it shows the profit and if the debit balance is more than the credit balance, it shows the loss.
Learn more about "Income summary":
brainly.com/question/9122916
The best answer for this question would be:
$150,000
Because in the method of the “non-working” spouse method, they are given a calculation of (18 - youngest child's age) × $10,000 (18 being the legal age)
Resulting that the solution would be:
<span> (18 - 3) × $10,000 = $150,000</span>
Answer:
a non-cooperative game strategy, where participants independently choose their strategy to maximize their payoffs.
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed about Bob, who attended the university football game last week . At the opening kickoff, the crowd stood up. Bob therefore had to stand up as well to see the game. In this case, Bob was participating in a non-cooperative game of strategy, where participants collectively choose their strategy to maximize their joint payoffs. Non-cooperative game strategy can be regarded as the rational ways economic agent relate with each other so that their goals can be achieved. In this game both the available strategies as well as the outcome from various choices will be listed.
